Joel 3 – Promise of Redemption

In that day the smaller nations (mountains) will rejoice (wort) and the larger nations (hills) will produce food in abundance (milk). Hills and Hills are biblical figures to refer to nations, with mountains referring to small kingdoms, and hills to great nations. Israel is compared to a mountain and the great civilizations of antiquity to hills. Ex: Babylon, Egypt, etc. Must is a figure of joy, rejoicing and milk a figure of food in abundance.


Joel 3 – Promise of Redemption

1 FOR, behold, in those days, and at that time, when I will remove the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem,

Through this verse it is clear that Israel is under the weight of the Lord, and that only at the time determined by God (at that time) will they be a free people.

Only “in those days” will the captivity of the people of Israel be removed, which suggests that they are bound by their sins.

 

2 I will gather all the nations, and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat; and there I will enter into judgment with them, for the sake of my people, and of my inheritance, Israel, whom they scattered among the nations and divided my land.

The prophet Joel speaks of the judgment of the nations as Jesus announced to the disciples: “All nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates his sheep from the goats” (Mt 25:32). It is Christ who will gather, gather and gather the nations to judge them at the end of the great tribulation, beginning of the millennium.

At the end of the millennium Satan will go out to deceive the nations and gather the kingdoms of the world to fight against the Lord’s Anointed (Ps 2:2-3), different from the gathering of peoples that will be carried out by Christ in order to make the judgment of the nations (Zec 12:2-3).

At the judgment the nations will be in the dock because of their treatment of the people of Israel. The ‘little brothers’ that Jesus refers to in Matthew 25, verse 40 (Mt 25:40), refers to the people of Israel: their people and inheritance, who were scattered among the nations in the period of great tribulation.

In Matthew 25, verse 40 the ‘little brethren’ does not refer to the church of Christ, which is designated as the wife of the Lamb.

Valley of Jehoshaphat refers to the plain of Amargeddon, meaning “Jehovah has judged”, and only Joel uses this name to describe the valley of Jehoshaphat (Joel 3:12).

3 And they cast lots for my people, and gave a boy for a harlot, and sold a girl for wine, to drink.

This verse describes the affliction that will befall the people of Israel in that day, as Jesus foretold: “For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever will be” (Mt 24:21).

 

4 And what also have ye with me, Tire and Sidon, and all the regions of Philistia? Is this the payment you give me? For if you pay me thus, I will soon make you pay your wages on your head.

The surrounding nations, whom God used as a rod of correction against Israel, repay what the Lord has given them, therefore, they would be punished as well.

 

5 Because you have taken my silver and my gold, and my desirable and beautiful things you have placed in your temples. 6 And ye sold the children of Judah and the children of Jerusalem to the children of the Greeks, to drive them away from their borders. 7 Behold, I will raise them up from the place where you sold them, and I will make your payment on your own head. 8 And I will sell your sons and your daughters into the hand of the children of Judah, and they will sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far away, for the LORD has spoken.

The rod that God used to punish his people would not pass unscathed, as happened with the Chaldeans (Hab 2:8). Everything they did to the children of Israel would happen to them.

 

9 Proclaim this among the Gentiles; prepare for war, stir up the strong; come, all men of war come up. 10 Beat your hoes into swords, and your sickles into spears; say the weak: I am strong.

The message that will be announced to the nations that will be judged by the Lamb of God is one of encouragement to come to the judgment.

Among the peoples it must be announced that there will be war, and that the strong must be summoned. All fit to fight let them go up. Let them prepare for battle, and let those who have no strength say: I am strong! Whatever you have in your hand for battle, let it be used by those summoned by the Lord.

 

11 Assemble yourselves, and come, all you Gentiles round about, and assemble yourselves. O LORD, bring down your strongholds there; 12 Let the Gentiles be aroused, and go up to the Valley of Jehoshaphat; for there I will sit to judge all the Gentiles round about.

The gathering of peoples will be immense and they will be gathered in the Valley of Jehoshaphat. Before this Valley Christ will sit to separate the sheep from the goats, that is, he will establish the judgment of the nations before reigning over the peoples of the earth (Mt 25:32).

The valiant among the peoples will descend to the Valley of Decision.

 

13 Throw in the sickle, for the harvest is ripe; come, come down, for the winepress is full, and the vessels of the winepresses overflow, because their malice is great. 14 Crowds, multitudes in the valley of decision; for the day of the LORD is near in the valley of decision.

When the sickle is thrown into the harvest, it is to gather the bundles. Throwing the sickle is equivalent to gathering peoples together.

When all the nations are gathered (full press), the Lord will establish his judgment. The prophet Isaiah aptly describes this event (Is 63:1-6).

 

15 The sun and moon will be darkened, and the stars will withdraw their brightness.

The picture described by the prophet Joel regarding the heavenly bodies was also prophesied by Christ: “And immediately after the affliction of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken” (Mt 24:29).

The affliction described in verse 3 precedes the appearance of the Messiah: “Then will appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven; and all the tribes of the earth shall mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory” (Mt 24:30).

 

16 And the LORD will roar out of Zion, and he will make his voice heard from Jerusalem; and the heavens and the earth will tremble, but the LORD will be the refuge of his people, and the strength of the children of Israel.

After the events of verse 15, Christ will appear in glory, and his voice will be heard from Jerusalem.

The Lion of the tribe of Judah will reign, and his roar will be heard from Zion.

The prophet Joel announces the reign of the Messiah over all the peoples of the earth. While the nations will tremble at the roar of the Lord, the Lord Jesus will be a refuge for his people, a strength for the children of Israel.

Note that the prophet Joel gives a description of the millennial kingdom, when Christ will sit on the throne of David and rule the nations with a rod of iron, according to the Father’s promise recorded in the Psalms (Ps 2:6 and Ps 2:8).

 

17 And ye shall know that I am the LORD your God, that dwell in Zion, my holy mountain; and Jerusalem shall be holy; strangers will no longer pass through it.

When the Lord Jesus dwells in Zion as king and priest, Mount Zion will be holy and the city will be holy. The city will be holy (set apart) because God will dwell with his people.

In that day all in Israel will know that the Christ they crucified is the Lord God of Israel, the Lord who hid his face from the house of Jacob (Isa 8:17; Ps 110:1).

After Christ is enthroned in Zion, no more “strangers” will invade or occupy the holy city.

 

18 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drip with new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall be full of water; and a spring shall come out of the house of the LORD, and shall water the valley of Shittim.

In that day the smaller nations (mountains) will rejoice (wort) and the larger nations (hills) will produce food in abundance (milk).

Hills and Hills are biblical figures to refer to nations, with mountains referring to small kingdoms, and hills to great nations. Israel is compared to a mountain and the great civilizations of antiquity to hills. Ex: Babylon, Egypt, etc.

Must is a figure of joy, rejoicing and milk a figure of food in abundance.

To say that ‘the rivers of Judah will be full of water’ is another figure, i.e. the prophet uses the figure of the river to speak of the streets of Judah, and the water represents the inhabitants (Rev 17:15; Isa 42:15) .

A special feature of the house of the Lord will be a fountain of water that will water the deep valley where the Dead Sea is located.

 

19 Egypt will be a desolation, and Edom a desolate waste, because of the violence they did to the children of Judah, in whose land they shed innocent blood.

A detailed description of the Lord’s burden on Egypt and Edom is found in the Book of Obadiah.

 

20 But Judah will be inhabited forever, and Jerusalem from generation to generation.

God promises that after those days the tribe of Judah will have an eternal dwelling, and that the city of Jerusalem will be occupied from generation to generation.

 

21 And I will cleanse the blood of those whom I had not cleansed; for the LORD will dwell in Zion.

Purification of the blood takes place through divine sonship. Only those who are generated anew by God are purified. While those begotten according to the flesh are unclean, those begotten according to the Spirit are pure, just like the heavenly Father.

In order to inhabit Jerusalem, the city of the great King, a man must necessarily be pure in heart and in spirit. Only those purified by God will be able to inhabit the city where the Lord of hosts will reside.

How does purification take place? God creates a new heart and a new spirit (Ps 51:10). After giving life to the heart and spirit of man, God takes up residence in him, which is essential for dwelling in Zion.

“For thus says the High and the Sublime, who dwells in eternity, whose name is Holy: In a high and holy place I dwell; and with the contrite and lowly in spirit, to revive the spirit of the lowly, and to revive the heart of the contrite” (Is 57:15).

Even in those days the cleansing of the blood will only take place through the new birth (John 3:3).




Download

The Work that demonstrates Love to God




The Work that demonstrates Love to God

“… which will allow us to understand why Jesus asked the apostle Peter three times: – “Simon , son of Jonah, do you love me?”, since the repeated questions of the Lord Jesus show us that it is not enough just to say: – ‘Yes, Lord, you know that I love you!'”


The Work that demonstrates Love to God

 

work-love-god   A obra que demonstra amor a Deus livro   lavoro-amore-dio

arbeit-liebe-gott   oeuvre-amour-dieu   obra-amor-dios

 


Presentation

What was pertinent to the world of ideas, to “should be”, becomes categorical and tangible in the world of being. Love ceases to be a religious and moral experience, or a one-sided expression of the soul, of the human psyche, and comes to rest in new categories.

The way in which the Author leaves aside the Greek categories on love, so usual when dealing with the subject, and replaces them with a safe and unique category that exists in the Old Testament is innovative. This rereading made me redimension the understanding of several biblical passages, among which the one is that contains the important warning of Christ: – “No servant can serve two masters; because, or you’ll hate one and love the other.” (Lk 16:13). The Author’s conception of biblical ‘love’ evidenced in this book is surprising.

The way he approaches complex biblical passages is peculiar and interprets outside of trivial hermeneutics. By comparing some biblical passages, the author leads the reader to an intriguing investigation and, at times, even generates a certain suspense that culminates in a surprising conclusion about the true meaning of such common biblical terms, such as love and hate.

While reading this work, the vision of love according to the romanticism and humanism that is so dear to us is quickly, replace   by a conception of love that takes on aristocratic and noble airs, a common scenario in the context in which the Scriptures has produced.

The fog of subjectivism permeated by the idealism that religious conceptions prescribe through the term ‘love’ is quickly replaced by a grave and objective imperative, which coats the theme with a unique new meaning.

Where I saw feeling, after reading this book, I see behavior. Love transcends the world of ideas, subjectivism, and idealism and claims its rightful place as action.

 

Introduction

“My little children’s let us not love by word or tongue, but by work and in truth.” (1 John 3:18).

freeWhen we hear about God, we has seized with reverent attitudes, a feeling of devotion invades us, and emotion speaks loudly. Often, when we read about God’s love for humanity, willingness comes to the surface and we want to turn our feelings and emotions into service.

When he went to fetch the ark of the cove from the house of Abinadab, King David was filling with devotion, full of emotions, overflowing with joy and reverent attitudes. David feasted with the people, with all sorts of musical instruments, attitudes that demonstrate how happy he was to bring the ark of the Lord to him.

With his vision clouded by joy, David let himself be carried away by the desperate attitude of the Philistines who, in distress because of hemorrhoids, returned the ark of the Lord on a chariot drawn by cows (1 Samuel 6:11). David and all the people of Israel forgot God’s ordinance and carelessly carried the ark using the means of transportation prepared by the priests and diviners of the Philistines (1 Samuel 6:2).

Everyone sang and played happily and following the ark that was on a new ox cart. When they reached Nachom’s threshing floor, the ark nearly fell because of the stumble of the oxen, and Uzzah, who was driving the chariot, reached out to catch it and was struck down by God (2 Samuel 6:6-7). That is when King David feared and asked the following question:

“How will the ark of the Lord come to me?”

The biblical passage that narrates the return of the ark of the Lord to the house of Israel serves as a warning. We are being willing to do a work according to our conjecture. Alternatively, we are we aware of what God requires of us according to his word.

Have you ever asked yourself – “What is the work that demonstrates your love for God?”; “What is the biblical concept of love?”; “What does God require of man?”

The event that awakened King David to seek (obey) God as God had commanded (1 Chronicles 15:2 and 13), made me wonder: a car pulled by cows?”; “Are we loving God as He commanded?”

During two millennia of Christianity, there were numerous cultural revolutions. Civilizations and cultures disappeared, while others flourished. Every civilization and every culture that came and went had its own concepts and ideas about love. Numerous religions arose and each priest, magician, diviner, mystic, minister, leader, government, etc., adopted or developed, according to their interests, a concept of love.

The purpose of this book is to help you understand what ‘love’ God requires of us, as well as the meaning of the term love used in the New Testament, which will allow us to understand why Jesus asked the apostle Peter three times: – “Simon , son of Jonah, do you love me?”, since the repeated questions of the Lord Jesus show us that it is not enough just to say:

“Yes, Lord, you know that I love you!”

 




For your sins

Christ suffered once for sins, the just for the unjust in order to lead men to God (1Pe 3:18). He is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2: 2), breaking down the barrier of enmity that existed between God and men. Once freed from Adam’s condemnation, man is able to do good works, for they are done only when one is in God (Is 26:12; John 3:21).


For your sins

I read an excerpt from Sermon No. 350, by Dr. Charles Haddon Spurgeon, under the title “A well-aimed shot at self-righteousness”, and I could not help commenting on a statement in the sermon.

The last sentence of the sermon caught my attention, which says: “Christ was punished for your sins before they were committed” Charles Haddon Spurgeon, excerpt from sermon No. 350 “A sure shot in self-righteousness”, taken from the web

Now, if Dr. Spurgeon considered the biblical text that says that Jesus is ‘the lamb that was slain since the foundation of the world’, in fact he should emphasize that Christ died before sin was introduced into the world (Rev 13: 8 ; Rom 5:12). However, as he claims that Jesus was punished before every Christian’s sin was committed individually, I understand that Dr. Spurgeon did not refer to verse 8, chapter 13 of the Book of Revelation.

Christ was punishing for the sin of all humankind, but who committed the offense that led all humankind to be under sin? Now, by the Scriptures we understand that sin comes from the offense (disobedience) of Adam, and not from the errors of conduct that men commit.

The punishment that brought peace was not due to errors of conduct made individually ’, since all men are generated in the condition of being alienated from God (sinners). Christ is the Lamb of God who died before the foundation of the world, that is, the lamb was offered before Adam’s offense took place.

The punishment that fell on Christ is not due to the conduct of men (sins committed), but to Adam’s offense. In Adam, men were made sinners, since by an offense came judgment and condemnation on all men, without exception (Rom. 5:18).

If sin (the condition of man without God) arises from the conduct of men, for justice to be established, necessarily salvation would only be possible through the conduct of men. It would be required that men do something good to ease their bad conduct; however, it would never be ‘justified’.

But the gospel message shows that by the offense of one man (Adam) all were condemned to death, and only by one man (Christ, the last Adam) did the gift of God’s grace abound over many (Rom. 5:15). When Jesus died for our sins, an act substitution took place: as Adam disobeyed, the last Adam was obedient until the ordeal.

The last sentence of the excerpt from Dr. Spurgeon’s sermon demonstrates that it was not considered that:

  • all men are sinners because the first father of mankind (Adam) sinned (Is 43:27);
  • that all men are formed in iniquity and conceived in sin (Ps 51: 5);
  • that all mankind has turned away from God since mother (Ps 58: 3);
  • that all men have been wrong since they were born (Ps 58: 3), because they entered through a wide door that gives access to a wide path that leads to perdition (Mt 7:13 -14);
  • that because they were sold as a slave to sin, no one transgressed according to Adam’s transgression (Rom. 5:14);
  • that the best of men is comparable to a thorn, and the upright is worse than a hedge of thorns (Mk 7: 4);
  • that all men have sinned and fall short of the glory of God because of the condemnation established in Adam;
  • That there is no righteous one, none at all, among the descendants of Adam (Rom. 3:10), etc.

What good or bad does a child do in his mother’s womb to be has conceived in sin? What sin does a child commit to walking ‘wrong’ since he was born? When and where did all men go astray and become filthy together? (Rom. 3:12) Wasn’t the loss of humanity through Adam’s offense?

In Adam, all men were made filthy together (Ps 53: 3), because Adam is the wide door through which all men enter at birth. Birth according to the flesh, blood and the will of the man is the wide door through which all men enter, turn aside and become unclean together (John 1:13).

What event made all men ‘together’ become unclean? Only Adam’s offense explains the fact that all men, in the same event, become unclean (together), since it is impossible for all men of countless ages to perform the same act together. Considering: Did Christ die because Cain killed Abel, or did Christ die because of Adam’s offense? Which of the events compromised the nature of all humanity? Cain’s act or Adam’s offense?

Note that Cain’s condemnation does not come from his criminal act, it stems from the condemnation in Adam. Jesus demonstrated that he did not come to condemn the world, but to save it, as it would be counterproductive to judge what is already condemned (John 3:18).

Christ was punishing because of the sin of humankind, however, sin does not refer to what men commit, rather it says of the offense that brought judgment and condemnation on all men, without distinction.

The actions of men under the yoke of sin is also called sin, since anyone who sins, because he is a slave to sin. The barrier of separation between God and men came about through Adam’s offense, and because of the offense in Eden, there is no one among the sons of men to do good. Why is there no one who does well? Because they have all gone astray and together they have become unclean. Therefore, because of Adam’s offense, everything that a man without Christ does is unclean.

Who from the unclean will take away what is pure? Nobody! (Job 14: 4) In other words, there is no one who does good because everyone is a slave to sin.

Now the slave of sin commits sin, since everything he does belongs to his master by right. The actions of the servants of sin are sinful because slaves to sin do them. That is why God has freed those who believe to be servants of righteousness (Rom. 6:18).

God’s children, on the other hand, cannot sin because they are born of God and the seed of God remains in them (1 John 3: 6 and 1 John 3: 9). Anyone who commits sin is of the devil, but those who believe in Christ belong to God (1Co 1:30; 1Jo 3:24; 1Jo 4:13), since they are the temple and abode of the Spirit (1Jo 3: 8).

Christ was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3: 5 and 1 John 3: 8), and all who are begotten of God abide in Him (1 John 3:24) and in God there is no sin (1 John 3: 5) . Now if there is no sin in God, it follows that all who are in God do not sin, since they were begotten from God and the seed of God remains in them.

A tree cannot bear two types of fruit. Thus, those who are born of the seed of God cannot produce fruit for God and the devil, just as it is impossible for a servant to serve two masters (Luke 16:13). Every plant planted by the Father bears much fruit, but it bears fruit only for God (Isaiah 61: 3; John 15: 5).

After dying to sin, the old master, it is up to the resurrected man to present himself to God as alive from the dead, and the members of his body as an instrument of justice (Rom. 6:13). The ‘living’ condition of the dead is acquired by faith in Christ, through regeneration (new birth). Through the new birth, man becomes alive from the dead, and it remains, therefore, to voluntarily present to God the members of his body as an instrument of justice.

Sin no longer reigns, for it no longer has dominion over those who believe (Rom. 6:14). The Christian must offer his members to serve righteousness, that is, to serve the One who sanctified them, since Christ is the justification and sanctification of Christians (Rom. 6:19; 1Co 1:30).

Christ suffered once for sins, the just for the unjust in order to lead men to God (1Pe 3:18). He is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2: 2), breaking down the barrier of enmity that existed between God and men. Once freed from Adam’s condemnation, man is able to do good works, for they are done only when one is in God (Is 26:12; John 3:21).

Men without God, on the other hand, exist without hope in this world, because they are like the unclean and everything they produce is unclean. There is no way for man without God to do well, because evil nature only produces badly.

“But we are all like the filthy, and all our righteousness’s like the filthy rag; and we all wither like a leaf, and our iniquities like a wind take us away ”(Isa 64: 6).

The prophet Isaias in describing the condition of his people compared them too:

  • The unclean – When did the people of Israel become unclean? When all went astray and together became unclean, that is, in Adam, the first Father of mankind (Ps 14: 3; Isa 43:27);
  • Justice as filthy rags – All works of justice of the filthy are comparable to filthy rags, which are not suitable for clothing. Although they were religious, the works of the people of Israel were works of iniquity, works of violence (Is 59: 6);
  • Wither like the leaf – There was no hope for the people of Israel, as the leaf was dead (Is 59:10);
  • Iniquities are like wind – Nothing Israel did could free them from this horrendous condition, since iniquity is comparable to the wind that snatches the leaf, that is, man cannot get rid of the lord of sin.

Christ, in his time, died for the wicked.

Sinners have sacrificed the Lamb of God since the foundation of the world.

“Because Christ, while we were still weak, died in due time for the wicked” (Rom. 5: 6);

“But God proves his love for us, in that Christ died for us, while we are still sinners” (Rom. 5: 8).

Now, Christ died for the slaves of sin and not for the ‘sins’ that the slaves of sin practice, as Dr. Spurgeon understood.

Christ died for sinners, therefore those who believe die together with Him. Christ died for all so that those who are quickened may no longer live for themselves, but live for the One who died and rose again (2Co 5:14).

Those who have risen with Christ are safe, since:

  • they are in Christ;
  • they are new Creatures;
  • the old things are gone;
  • everything has become new (2Co 5:17).

God reconciled with Himself those who believe through Christ and gave the living from the dead the ministry of reconciliation (2Co 15:18).

The living among the dead are lifting with the exhortation: do not receive the grace of God in vain (2 Cor. 6: 1). God heard you in an acceptable time, therefore, as an instrument of justice Christians has recommended too:

  • Do not give scandal at all – Why shouldn’t Christians give scandal? To be saved? No! Lest the ministry of reconciliation be censored;
  • Being recommendable in everything – In a lot of patience, in afflictions, in needs, in anguish, in whips, in riots, in riots, in work, in vigils, in fasts, in purity, in science, in long-suffering, in kindness, in the Holy Spirit, in unfeigned love, etc. (2Co 6: 3-6).

Christ was killed since the foundation of the world, even before all mankind became a slave to injustice due to the disobedience of one man who sinned: Adam.




The Samaritan woman

When the Samaritan woman discovered that she was facing a prophet, she wanted to know about spiritual issues: worship, and left her personal needs in the background.


The Samaritan woman

 

“The woman said to him, Lord, I see that you are a prophet!” (John 4:19)

Introduction

The evangelist John recorded that everything he wrote has intended to lead his readers to believe that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of the living God, and believing, they had life in abundance

“These, however, were written so that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that, believing, you may have life in his name” (John 20:31).

In particular, there are elements in the story of the Samaritan woman that demonstrate that Christ is the Son of the living God, the Son of David promised in the Scriptures.

The evangelist John recorded that when Jesus found that the Pharisees had heard that He performed many miracles and that He baptized far more than John the Baptist, he left Judea and went to Galilee (John 4: 2-3), and that had to pass through Samaria (Luke 17:11).

Jesus went to a city in Samaria called Sychar, whose territory was an estate that Jacob gave to his son Joseph (John 4: 5). The place where Jesus went in Sychar had a well drilled by Jacob.

The evangelist highlights Jesus’ humanity by describing his tiredness, hunger and thirst. When mentioning that his disciples went to buy food, he gives us to understand that Jesus needs to eat, that he sat down because he was tired and, when asking the Samaritan woman for water, it is implied that he was thirsty.

Although the focus of the evangelist’s approach was not to demonstrate that the Lord Jesus was thirsty for water, as what became evident was his need to announce the good news of the kingdom to women, it is clear that Jesus came in the flesh (1Jo 4: 2-3 and 2 John 1: 7).

Jesus sat by the well of Jacob, near the sixth hour (noon) (John 4: 6, 8).

When a Samaritan woman arrives at the fountain to draw water (naming someone by the name of the city was dishonorable, because it demonstrated that such an individual did not belong to the community of Israel), and was approached by the Master who addressed him saying:

– Give me a drink (John 4: 7).

The Lord’s attitude toward the Samaritan (asking for water) brought out what noble men and women have most noble: reason, reasoning (Job 32: 8).

The woman must have asked a question based on a range of prior knowledge. She did not formulate the most brilliant thought of humanity, but it did raise an important question for that woman and her people:

– How, being a Jew, do you ask me to drink from me, that I am a Samaritan woman? (John 4: 9).

Jews discriminated against Samaritans, but Jesus, despite being a Jew, did not give importance to this issue, but the woman served his purpose very well at that time.

In the question, the woman points out that she was both a woman and a Samaritan, that is, that there was a double impediment to that man who, apparently, should be more of a jealous Jew of his religiosity.

Many questions arose in the Samaritan’s head, as Jesus ignored practices and rules pertaining to Judaism when asking for water. – Did he not realize that I am a woman and a Samaritan? Will he drink the water I give him without fear of becoming contaminated?

 

The Gift of God

After awakening the Samaritan’s reasoning, Jesus further stimulates the woman’s interest:

– “If you know the gift of God, and who is he who says to you: Give me a drink. You would ask him, and he would give you living water.”

The Samaritan woman did not immediately reach the excellence of the words of Christ, because she had no experience in the truth.

“But solid sustenance is for the perfect, who, because of custom, have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil” (Heb 5:14).

If the Samaritan had her mind exercised in truth, she would not ask the question:

– Lord, you have nothing to take with you, and the well is deep; where, then, do you have living water?

From the argument, you can see that the Samaritan woman focuses on the impossibility of reaching water without the necessary means, however, she did not contest what Jesus said about having living water.

Not considering Jesus’ initial argument about the gift of God, she analyzed:

– Are you greater than or father Jacob, who gave us the well, drinking himself, and his children, and his livestock?

Offering a water alternative other than the water at Jacob’s well made it seem to the Samaritan that that unknown Jew was, at the very least, presumptuous, as he placed himself in a position superior to that of Jacob, who left the well as a legacy to his children and, which at that time provided the need for many Samaritans.

The following questions needed answers:

– You do not have to draw water and the well is deep! Where do you have living water?

But Jesus was working so that the “hearing” of that woman would be awakened by the word of God, because his proposal made it known that He was, in fact, superior to the father Jacob himself.

It was at this point that the Samaritan’s lack of knowledge was, for if she knew who Jesus was, she would simultaneously know the gift of God, because Christ is the gift of God.

If she knew whom she was asking:

– Give me a drink, I would know that He was greater than the father Jacob was; I would know that Christ was the promised descendant to Abraham in whom all the families of the earth would be blessed (Gen. 28:14).

If she knew who the Christ was, she would see that through the water that Christ was offering, in fact and by law, she would become one of the children of Abraham. If she knew Christ, she would see that the children according to the flesh are not the children of Abraham, but the children of the Faith, the descendants of the last Adam (Christ) who was manifesting himself to the world (Gal 3:26 -29; Rom. 9: 8).

If she knew Christ, she would see that despite being part of the last she could take part among the first, because through the Seed it is possible for all peoples to be blessed as the believer Abraham (Mt 19:30).

If she knew the One who asked for a drink and who was offering him living water, she would see that He is the gift of God, for it is Christ who gives life to the world (John 1: 4). She would see that He is the high priest according to the order of Melchizedek, by whom all men, of any tribe or language, can offer gifts and be accepted by God.

“You ascended on high, you took captivity captive, you received gifts for men, and even for the rebels, that the Lord God might dwell among them” (Ps 68:18).

God testified to the offering (gifts) that Abel had offered because of him who would ascend high and take captivity captive, the high priest made up of God without beginning and (eternal) end of the day (Heb 7: 3)

Who offered himself to himself as a lamb unsullied to God, and only through Him are men accepted by God (Heb 7:25).

 

Daily necessities

The woman’s question:

– Are you bigger than our father Jacob?

was pertinent, however, it still did not allow him to identify who was that man who asked for water from the source of Jacob and, at the same time, offered living water.

“Whoever drinks this water will thirst again; But whoever drinks the water that I give him will never be thirsty, because the water that I give him will become a source of water in him that leaps into eternal life” (John 4:14).

It is surprising that the Samaritan woman, who had an elaborate, thought when she realized that Jesus was implying that she was greater than Father Jacob was, accepted his proposal, that he had water that would prevent him from being thirsty, nevertheless asking you water by the well of Jacob.

Jesus’ proposal was clear:

‘Whoever drinks the water I give him will never be thirsty’, and what did he want water for, if he had superior waster?

The woman was interested in Jesus’ offer, but her understanding was blurred.

What made the woman want the water Jesus offered her, even though the Master was thirsty?

The answer has found in the Samaritan’s request:

– Lord, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty again, and do not come here to draw it.

Nowadays it is almost unimaginable the work that that woman had to acquire some water. It was the sixth hour when the woman went to fetch water to supply her basic needs.

While in our day what many understand by basic, essential, is different from what that woman needed, it is possible to measure how much what man understands as essential muddies reasoning. If what is essential compromises the understanding of what is proposed in the gospel, what about the affairs of this life?

A man the Samaritan woman did not know asked for water, and now he offered water with unimaginable properties: he would quench his thirst so that he would no longer need to drink water again.

When the woman showed interest in ‘living water’, Jesus said:

– Go, call your husband, and come here.

– The woman replying, I do not have a husband. Jesus replied:

– You said well, I have no husband; because you had five husbands, and what you now have is not your husband; this you said with truth.

Note that Jesus did not issue a judgment of values ​​on the condition of the woman, for He Himself said that He judges no one according to the flesh, for He came not to judge the world, but to save (John 8:15; John 12:47).

At this point, the woman recognized Jesus as a prophet:

– Lord, I see that you are a prophet! It is interesting that the Samaritan woman recognized that Jew as a prophet at the same time and, at the same time, surprisingly, asked the following question: Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, and you say that Jerusalem is the place to worship.

When the Samaritan woman discovered that Christ was a prophet, she set aside her basic needs and began to inquire about the place of worship.

As a Samaritan, she knew very well the story that led Jews to not communicate with Samaritans.

The book of Ezra contains one of the misunderstandings that existed between Jews and Samaritans because the Jews did not allow the Samaritans to help build the second temple under Cyrus’ order (Ed 4: 1-24). The sedition started because the king of Assyria installed in the cities of Samaria people from Babylon who came to inhabit the region, replacing the people of Israel who were previously taken captive and who adopted the Jewish religion (2Ki 17:24 comp. Ed 4: 2 and 9- 10).

The question as to the place of (worship) was millennial and, before a prophet, his daily quarrels were no longer important, because the opportunity was unique: to discover the place of worship and how to worship.

Is it curious to know what the reaction would be, in our day, if a Christian discovered that he was before a prophet? What would be the questions for someone who presented himself as a prophet?

I imagine that if today’s Christians found a prophet, the questions would be – When will I buy my house. When will I have my car? When am I getting married? Whom am I going to marry? Will my child be male or female? When will I pay off my debts? Will I get rich? Etc.

However, the Samaritan, upon discovering that she was before a prophet, wanted to know about spiritual matters, leaving her earthly needs in the background. It was not important to know whether she would have a husband, or whether she would stop, walking to Jacob is well to draw water. Now, the question of the place of worship had been going on for generations and could not miss that opportunity.

With the statement:

– I see that you are a prophet! We can consider that the woman understood what was really happening.

Unlike other Jews who were fixated on their religiosity, legalism and ritualism, Israel’s prophets were not Jews tied to such bonds.

It was like saying: – Ah, now I understand! You are like Elijah and Elisha, prophets who were not pleaded with other peoples, since both went to other nations and even entered the home of orphans, widows, etc. Only as a prophet to communicate with a Samaritan woman, since Elijah went to the home of a widow who lived in Sarepta, in the lands of Sidon and asked him for water to drink:

“Bring me, I ask you, a little water to drink in a vase” (1Ki 17:10).

Elisha, in turn, used what was offered to him by a wealthy woman who lived in the city of Sunem, who was similarly named after the city name as was the case with the Samaritan woman (2 Kings 4: 8).

It is extremely important to analyze Nicodemus’ history in comparison with that of the Samaritan woman, because before God a man with all moral and intellectual qualities as was the case with Nicodemus is equal to someone without any merit, as was the case with the Samaritan woman.

 

Worship

That is when Jesus replied:

– Women, believe the hour is coming, when neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem you will worship the Father.

Jesus taught the Samaritan woman that the time had come, because worship was no longer tied to a mountain, be it the mountain of Jerusalem or that of Samaria.

Jesus asked the Samaritan woman to believe in him and to follow his teaching – “Woman, believe me…” (v. 21). Then he addresses a question common to Jews and Samaritans: – “You adore what you do not know; we love what we know because salvation comes from the Jews”.

Although the Samaritans understood that they worshiped God, yet they worshiped Him without knowing Him. The condition of the Samaritans is that which the apostle Paul portrayed to Christians in Ephesus:

“Remember, therefore, that you were formerly Gentiles in the flesh, and called uncircumcision by those in the flesh called circumcision made by the hand of men; That at that time you were without Christ, separated from the community of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world ” (Eph 2:11 -12).

Having a willingness to worship God does not give man the status of a true worshiper, because the Jews also worshiped, and worshiped what they knew, for salvation comes from the Jews (John 4:22), however, such worship was not in spirit and in truth (v. 23). The prophets protested about this fact:

“For the Lord has said, For this people come near me, and with their mouth, and with their lips, honor me, but their heart turns away from me, and their fear for me consists only of commandments of men, in which he was instructed ” (Is 29:13).

Jesus’ statement equals Jews and Samaritans, as both believed they worshiped God; however, their worship was something that came only from the mouth, but away from the ‘kidneys’

“You planted them, and they took root; they grow, they also bear fruit; you are at your mouth, but far from your kidneys” (Jer 12: 2).

Jesus presents the true concept of worship when he says:

“But the hour is coming, and it is now, when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth; because the Father seeks those who worship him” (v. 23).

Worship of God is only possible in spirit and in truth, unlike worship with the lips, which refers to an ‘approach’ to God only with the lips; it has an appearance, however, the heart remains alienated from God.

What is the Father looking for? True worshipers, that is, those who worship in spirit and in truth. According to the Scriptures, the eyes of God seek the righteous; the faithful on the face of the earth, for only those who walk the straight path can serve him “My eyes will be on the faithful of the land, which they may sit with me; he who walks in a straight path will serve me” (Ps 101: 6), which contrasts with the condition of the people of Israel: “Yet they seek me every day, they take pleasure in knowing my ways, as a people who do justice, and do not leave the right of their God; they ask me for the rights of justice, and they delight in reaching out to God ” (Isa 58: 2).

That is, God is close to those who call on Him, however, to those who call on Him in truth “The LORD is near to all who call on him, to all who call on him in truth” (Ps 145: 18). Only by invoking God ‘in truth’ is enmity broken and fellowship re-established to the point that man settles with God “And he raised us up with him and made us sit in heavenly places, in Christ Jesus” (Eph. 2: 6).

How to call on God in truth? Entering the door of righteousness. Only those who enter the door of righteousness earn true praise to God (Ps 118: 19). Only those who enter the door of the Lord are faithful and righteous (Ps 118: 20), and only on these, the eyes of the Lord are.

Jesus makes it clear that: “God is a Spirit, and it is important that those who worship him worship him in spirit and in truth”, why, God is Spirit, and Jesus adds that the words He said are spirit and life (John 7:63).

Wherefore, in order to worship in spirit and in truth it is necessary for man to be born of water and the Spirit (John 3: 5), to be born of the words spoken by Christ.

 

The certainty of the Samaritan woman

Despite the daily necessity of having to fetch water, which indicated that woman’s humble condition, as she did not have a slave, she had hope. Although she does not belong to the Israeli community, she was certain:

– I know that the Messiah (who call Christ) comes; when he comes, he will announce everything to us.

Where did such certainty come from? Now, such assurance came from the Scriptures. Her confidence was firm, as she did not expect to have a private well, or a husband of her own. The Scriptures did not promise financial or family improvement, but it indicated that Christ, the mediator between God and men, was to come, and that He would make known to men everything that pertains to the kingdom of God.

In view of the woman’s trust in the Scriptures, Jesus reveals himself: – I am, I speak to you! Why did Jesus reveal himself to that woman, if in other biblical passages he directs his disciples not to reveal to anyone that He was the Christ? (Mt 16:20) Because the true confession is that which stems from the testimony that the Scriptures give about Christ (John 5:32 and 39), and not from miraculous signs (John 1:50; John 6:30).

At that moment the disciples arrived and were perplexed that Christ was talking to a woman

“And in this came his disciples, and marveled that he was speaking to a woman; yet none said to him, what questions? On the other hand: Why do you talk to her? ” (v. 27).

The Samaritan woman abandoned her intent, ran to the city, and called on the men to investigate whether the Jew at the source of Jacob was the Christ.

“So he left the woman his jar, and went into the city, and said to those men, ‘Come, and see a man who has told me all that I have done. Is this not the Christ? ” (P. 28 and 29).

As a woman at the time was a second-class citizen, she did not impose her belief, rather she urged men to go to Jesus and to analyze his words. The townspeople left and went to Christ

“So they left the city and went to him” (v. 30).

Again, the marks of a true prophet became evident:

“And they were offended in him. But Jesus said to them, “There is no prophet without honor, except in his homeland and in his house” (Mt 13:57). Among foreigners Jesus was honored as a prophet, different from his homeland and home (Mt 13:54).

The disciples pleaded with the Master:

– Rabí, eat. Jesus answered them: – I have food to eat that you do not know.

Their conception was still focused on human needs. That was when Jesus declared to them that he was ‘hungry’ to do his Father’s will, and to do his work. What work would it be? The answer is in John 6, verse 29:

“This is the work of God: believe in him whom he sent”.

While his disciples knew how to read the times when this world was planted and harvested (John 4:34), Jesus was ‘seeing’ the white fields for the Father’s harvest. From that moment when Christ was manifesting himself to the reapers were already receiving their wages in the world, and the harvest for eternal life had already begun, and both the sower and the reaper were rejoiced by the work accomplished (v. 36).

Jesus quotes a saying: “One is the sower, and the other is the reaper” (v. 37), and warns his disciples that they were being commissioned to reap in fields that they did not work (v. 38). What fields are these? Now the fields that Jesus saw as ready for harvest were the Gentiles. They had never worked among the Gentiles, now they were commissioned to work among the Gentiles, as others had already done this mister, that is, some prophets like Elijah and Elisha had gone to the Gentiles foreshadowing the mission they were to perform (v. 38) .

Because of the woman’s testimony, he said:

– He told me everything I have done, many of the Samaritans believed in Christ. Because she said: He told me everything I have done, Jesus went to  (the Samaritans) and stayed with them for two days, and they believed in him because of his words (John 4:41).

They did not believe in Christ only by the testimony of the woman, but they believed because, hearing Christ announce the kingdom of heaven to them, they believed that He truly was the Savior of the world (John 4:42).

 

Distortions

While the purpose of Scripture and Christ was for men to believe that He is the Savior of the world, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, etc., in our day there are different types of gospels that do not promote the true work of God, that is: that men believe in Christ as the envoy of God.

Their hope is not for the world to come, in which Christ will come and take those who believe with Him (John 14: 1-4), but fixate on the things and desires of this world.

Many false teachers draw the attention of the unwary by pointing out their daily needs. Why? Because the needs of men cloud the reasoning and do not let them, analyze essential logical questions. The speech of false teachers always points to the needs of everyday life to confuse the unwary, as their speeches are vain.

There are those who will surround themselves with teachers according to their interests and who turn to fables (2 Tim. 4: 4). Others consider Christ to be a source of profit, and co-opt those who want to get rich (1 Tim. 6: 5-9).

However, there are also those who have the appearance of godliness, which is just another religion, because their message is aimed at orphans and widows, fighting for the cause of the poor and in need of material goods, but they deny the effectiveness of the gospel, because they contradict essential truths such as the future resurrection from the dead and the return of Jesus (2 Tim 2:18 and 3: 5)

“Why, what is our hope, or joy, or crown of glory? Are you not also before our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming? ” (1Th 2:19).




The epistle of James

The work required in the epistle of James who says he has faith (belief) is the work that perseverance ends (Jas 1: 4), that is, it is to remain believing in the perfect law, the law of freedom (Jas 1:25) .


The epistle of James

 

Introduction

James the Just, possibly one of Jesus’ brothers (Mt 13:55; Mark 6: 3), is the author of this epistle.

Brother James was only converted after Christ’s resurrection (John 7: 3-5; Ac 1:14; 1 Cor 15: 7; Gal 1:19), becoming one of the leaders of the church in Jerusalem, and is appointed as one of the pillars of the church (Gal. 2: 9).

The epistle of James is dated around 45 AD. C., well before the first council in Jerusalem, that took place around 50 d. C., which makes the oldest New Testament epistle. According to the historian Flávio Josefo, Tiago was killed around the year 62 d. Ç.

The addressees of the epistle are scattered Jews converted to Christianity (Jas 1: 1), hence the austere tone and language peculiar to the Jews.

When he wrote this epistle, James sought to oppose the Jewish teaching of having faith in the one God, with the teaching of the gospel, which is to have faith in Jesus Christ, because it is useless to say that he believes in God, but that he does not obey the commandment of God. God, which is to believe in Christ. James’ approach reminds us of what Jesus taught: “DO NOT let your heart be troubled; you believe in God, you also believe in me” (John 14: 1), showing the relevance of the subject addressed in terms of the target audience: Jews converted to Christianity.

However, a misunderstanding about the epistle of James spread throughout Christendom, that he defended salvation by works, opposing the apostle to the Gentiles, who defended salvation by faith.

The misunderstanding of James’ approach made Martin Luther loathe this epistle, calling it “straw epistle”. He failed to see that James’ teaching is no different from that taught by the apostle Paul.

 

Summary of the Epistle of James

The epistle of James begins with an exhortation to perseverance in the faith, since in perseverance the work of faith is concluded (Jas 1: 3-4). Whoever endures trials without fading is blessed, since he will receive the crown of life from God, which will be given to those who obey (love) him (Jas 1:12).

James uses the term ‘faith’ in the sense of ‘believing’, ‘believing’, ‘trusting’, unlike the apostle Paul, who uses the term both in the sense of ‘believing’ and in the sense of ‘truth’, and this the latter meaning is much more used than that.

Then, James presents the essence of the gospel, which is the new birth through the word of truth (Jas 1:18). After asserting that it is necessary to receive the word of the gospel as an obedient servant, which is the power of God for salvation (James 2: 21), James exhorts his interlocutors to fulfill what is determined in the gospel, not forgetting the doctrine of Christ (James 2: 21).

James recalls that anyone who is attentive to the truth of the gospel and perseveres in it, not being a forgotten listener, is doing the work established by God: believing in Christ (James 2:25).

In view of the work required by God, James demonstrates that to be religious without restraining what comes from the heart, is to deceive oneself, and that individual’s religion proves to be in vain (James 2: 26-27).

Again, James calls his interlocutors brothers, and then he calls them not to show respect to people, since they professed believers in Christ (Jas 2: 1). If someone says that he is a believer in the Lord Jesus, he must proceed according to that belief: not respecting people because of origin, language, tribe, nation, etc. (Jas 2:12)

Tiago’s approach changes again through a serious one: – ‘My brothers’, to ask them if it is beneficial to say that they have faith, if they have no works. Is it possible for a belief without saving works?

The term work in context must be understood according to the view of man of antiquity, which is the result of obedience to a commandment. For men at the time, a master’s command and a servant’s obedience resulted in work.

The approach changes from people to salvation. First, whoever has faith in Christ cannot respect. Second: Whoever says he has faith that God is one, if he does not do the work required by God, he will not be saved.

The issue is not about someone who claims to have faith in Christ, but someone who claims to have faith is faith in one God. Whoever has faith in Christ will be saved, for this is the work required by God. You cannot save someone who claims to have faith in God, but who does not believe in Christ, since he is not the doer of the work.

The work required of those who say they have faith (belief) is the work that perseverance ends (Jas 1: 4), that is, it is to remain believing in the perfect law, the law of freedom (Jas 1:25).

As Christian converts among Jews knew that the work required by God is to believe in Christ, by arguing that it is not enough to say that he has faith, James was emphasizing that it is harmless to believe in God and not to believe in Christ.

The approach in chapter 3 changes again when it is said: my brothers (Jas 3: 1). The instruction is aimed at those who wanted to be masters, however, for this ministerial exercise it is essential to be ‘perfect’. To be ‘perfect’ in the context is not to stumble over the word of truth (Jas 3: 2), and thus will be able to lead the body (the students).

After examples of what the word is capable of promoting, again the approach is changed, to address the impossibility of proceeding with different messages from the same person, contrasting the knowledge of God versus the wisdom and human tradition (Jas 3:10 -12).

Finally, the instruction is that Christians converted from among Jews should not speak ill of one another (James 4:11), and, by figure (wealthy), make reference to the Jews who killed Christ.

The epistle is closed by addressing the initial theme: perseverance (Jas 5:11), encouraging believers to be patient in suffering.

 

The main misconceptions of interpretation

  1. Understand that Tiago is concerned with issues such as social justice, income distribution, charitable actions, etc;
  2. To consider the severe rebuke to the ‘rich’ who accumulate goods as a rebuke to those who held material wealth is to fail to observe that the term ‘rich’ is a figure that applies to Jews;
  3. Understand that James’ letter is antagonistic to the teaching of the apostle Paul, who presents salvation by faith in Christ Jesus. In fact, James shows that believing in God is not what God requires for salvation, but rather, believing that Jesus is the Christ, the work of faith;
  4. Understand that good deeds are required to authenticate those who have genuine faith. Whoever has faith in Christ according to the Scriptures, has genuine faith, for this is the work required by God;
  5. Confuse good works with the fruit by which the tree is identified.



Did Mary pour perfume on Jesus’ feet?

Mary, called Magdalene, is not Lazarus’ sister. The only information we have about Mary Magdalene is that she has freed from evil spirits and that she was present at the time of Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, accompanying her mother, Mary.


Did Mary pour perfume on Jesus’ feet?

 

Narrative of the evangelist João

The evangelist John narrates that Jesus, six days before the Passover feast, went to the city of Bethany, city of Lazarus, who was dead for four days and whom Jesus raised from the dead (John 12: 1).

A dinner was offered and, as usual, Martha served the table, at which were Jesus and Lazarus, among others (Luke 10:40; John 12: 2).

At a certain moment, during the supper, in the presence of the disciples, Mary took an arrátel [1] of pure nard ointment, of great value, and anointed Jesus’ feet. Then she started to dry Jesus’ feet with her hair, so that the house has perfumed with the smell of the ointment (John 12: 3).

This is the same Mary who stayed at Jesus’ feet, to listen to his teachings, while Martha took care of the household chores (John 11: 2; Luke 10:42).

 

Narratives of the evangelists Matthew and Mark

Evangelists Matthew and Mark narrate a similar event, which deals with a woman who spilled a perfume, an act similar to that performed by Mary, brother of Lazarus, however, this woman spilled the nard on Jesus’ head and did not use her hair to dry it.

Evangelist Mark situates the event in time as being two days before Easter, and both Matthew and Mark plot the place as the home of Simon the leper (Mark 14: 1-3; Mt 26: 6-7) .

Unlike John, the evangelists Matthew and Mark did not register the woman’s name, which shows that she was a stranger from the circle of the apostles, since everyone knew Lazarus and his two sisters, Martha and Mary.

Knowing the person’s identity or their relationship with another, which is well known, makes the narrators not forget to register the person’s name. The evangelist John does not mention the name of the Samaritan woman, because she belonged to a people that did not communicate with the Jews, she was a woman and a foreigner, therefore, the disciples had no proximity to her. What marked the woman was her origin, Samaria, and the disagreement between Samaritans and Jews, matters sufficiently important for the narrative (John 4: 7).

 

Narrative of the evangelist Lucas

Luke recounts another event, involving Jesus and a woman, when a Pharisee invited him to eat. When Jesus was seated at the table, a woman approached who, weeping, washed Jesus’ feet with tears and wiped her feet with her hair; and then she kissed and anointed Jesus’ feet with the ointment that was in the vessel (Luke 7: 37-38).

The Pharisee, seeing this scene, murmured, saying: “If he had been a prophet, he would have known who and which woman was the one who touched him, for she is a sinner” (Luke 7:39). The Pharisee knew the woman and labeled her as a sinner, but the evangelist Lucas did not know her and neither would her name be relevant, as she had no relationship with other New Testament characters.

 

Synoptic Gospels

What can being seen from reading the synoptic gospels is that, six days before the Passover feast, Mary, sister of Lazarus, in the city of Bethany, during a dinner, anointed Jesus’ feet and wiped them with her hair. Later, another woman, whose name is not revealed, in the house of Simon the leper, poured the same perfume on Jesus’ head, thus anointing her body (Mt 26: 7, 12; Mark 14: 3, 8 ).

In the narratives of the evangelists Matthew and Mark, Jesus was in Bethany, at the home of the leper Simon, when a woman poured an expensive perfume bottle on his head. The woman’s action provoked indignation in the disciples, who claimed that the perfume was very expensive and that it could be given to the poor. Jesus, in turn, rebuked the disciples, highlighting the law (Deut 15:11), and that that woman’s act was the harbinger of her death and grave, and that that event would be reported wherever the Gospel has announced (Mt 26: 10-13; Mark 14: 6-9).

John, in his Gospel, tells that the event happened in Bethany, six days before Easter, and that Lazarus was present. He points out that Mary takes the perfume and anoints Jesus ‘feet, wiping them with her hair, while Marta served the table, which suggests that dinner took place at Lazarus’ house.

Mary, called Magdalene, is not Lazarus’ sister. The only information we have about Mary Magdalene is that she has freed from evil spirits and that she was present at the time of Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, accompanying her mother, Mary.

“And some women who had been healed of evil spirits and diseases, Mary, called Magdalene, from whom seven demons came out” (Luke 8: 2).

Mary Magdalene, too, was not the sinful woman who washed Jesus’ feet with her tears in the Pharisee’s house, as reported by evangelist Luke. There is no biblical basis for considering Mary Magdalene as a prostitute or sinner or, as Lazarus’ sister.

St. Gregory the Great, who lived for almost 1500 years, was the one who wrongly identified Mary Magdalene as the “sinner” of Luke 8, verse 2, and as the same Mary of Bethany, Lazarus’ sister.

 

The Marias

Evangelist John makes it clear that the woman who anointed Christ’s feet in Bethany during a dinner was Mary, the sister of Lazarus (John 11: 2). It is unlikely that the evangelist was mistaken about the identity of the person who anointed Christ’s feet and dried with his hair, as he knew both: Mary, sister of Lazarus and Mary Magdalene, so it follows that the woman who anointed Jesus’ feet is not Mary Magdalene.

Evangelist Lucas, after narrating the episode of the woman who, in a Pharisee’s house, washed Jesus’ feet with tears and wiped them with her hair, makes reference to Mary Magdalene as a follower of Jesus, with other women. Therefore, the evangelist Lucas knew Mary Magdalene, and there is no reason why he omitted her name, if the woman who washed Jesus’ feet with tears was really Mary Magdalene.

It is worth mentioning that the event narrated by the beloved doctor took place around Galilee and, at a different time of the Passover, specifically the Passover that preceded the death of Christ. The last Passover is only reporter in chapter 22, while the story of the woman who watered Jesus’ feet has reported in chapter 7 of the gospel of Luke.

Despite the similarities between the stories narrated by the evangelists, the narratives of Matthew and Mark refer to the same woman who, in turn, is not Mary, the sister of Lazarus, nor the sinner reported by Lucas.

The differences between the story narrated by Matthew and Mark, that narrated by Luke and John, suggest that the story written by Matthew and Mark deals with a woman unknown to the apostles. She poured the precious balm over Christ’s head, while the other two women, Mary, sister of Lazarus and the sinner, anointed Christ’s feet.

Mateus and Marcos do not refer to the person of Lazarus, despite their historical importance, nor do they refer to Maria, Lazaro’s sister, a woman well known to the disciples.

Although Jesus was in Bethany, populated by Mary and her sister Martha, Jesus was dining at Simon the leper’s house two days before Easter, and not six days, as the evangelist John tells us.

The woman who is part of Matthew and Mark’s narrative did not use her hair to dry Jesus ‘feet, she just poured out the perfume, which leads to the conclusion that it was not Mary, Lazarus’ sister, and not even Mary. Magdalene, who was well known to the disciples.

 




Psalm 91 – he who dwells in the secret place of the most high will rest in the shadow  of the Almighty

he first step to interpret Psalm 91 is answer the following question (Psalm 91: 1): Who dwells in the secret place of the most high? It is possible for men reside in the recesses of the Almighty?


Psalm 91

  1. he who dwells in the secret place of the most high will rest in the shadow
    of the Almighty.
  2. I will say of the Lord: he is my God, my refuge, my stronghold, and in him
    will I trust.
  3. Because he will deliver you from the snare of the Fowler, and pernicious
    fever.
  4. He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings you will trust;
    his truth shall be thy shield and Buckler.
  5. you will not have fear of terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by
    day,
  6. nor the pestilence that walketh neither in darkness, nor of the
    destruction that devastates at noon.
  7. a thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at your right, but it
    will not come to you.
  8. only with thine eyes, and see the punishment of the wicked.
  9. Because thou, o Lord, are my refuge. In the most high did your housing.
  10. no evil befall thee, neither any plague come to the tent.
  11. Because he shall give his angels charge order, to keep you in all your
    ways.
  12. They will sustain you in your hands, so that lest you with your walk in
    stone.
  13. You will tread upon the lion and the cobra; you will trample the great
    lion and the serpent.
  14. Because so earnestly loved me, I will deliver him; put him on high,
    because he met the retreat my name.
  15. he shall call upon me, and I will answer him; I’ll be with him in
    anguish; it’ll take, and honor him.
  16. Satisfy him with length of days, and show him my salvations.91.

 

Introduction

It is common in homes, businesses and schools to find an open Bible in Psalm 91. Sometimes, by the action of the time, the pages are yellowed and dusty. Other hang on the door of their homes frames that adorn a copy of this Psalm.

Many use Psalm 91 to pray, while others cite excerpts from Psalm 91 in their prayers, but do we understand your meaning? And there are still those who don’t even read the Psalm, but by recommendation, make him an amulet.

Long-standing Psalm 91 is used as an amulet. Even religions spiritualists believe that Psalm 91 is powerful and should be used in needs to ask and thank the divine protection for everything and everyone.

But, in spite of these mystical conceptions, the question arises: how to understand and interpret Psalm 91?

The psalmist and King David was Prophet and separated the Levites for their prophecy with any sort of musical instruments and David, along with the army captains, separated to the Ministry the sons of Asaph, and Heman, and Jedutum, for their prophecy with harps, cymbals, and with “Dulcimer”; and this was the number of men fit for the work of his Ministry: (1 Chronicles 25: 1).

The book of the Chronicles of Israel makes it clear that the primary function of a psalmist was prophesying. King David commissioned the musicians to agree upon what gave prophecies in the form of poetry, so that one could sing them to the sound of musical instruments.

This proposal aimed to supply the deficiency of David read of the population, which mostly could not read and write. Just write the prophecies in formal texts not facilitated the learning process of the people, while the poetry and the music fit very well in this respect.

Therefore, when analyzing a Psalm, it should be borne in mind that they are prophetic-oriented compositions, and not just expressions of the soul, the product of the human psyche. In an analysis of Psalms must prioritize the message content to unveil their prophetic content. Poetic and musical issues are in the background.

Once the Lord Jesus asked the Pharisees about Psalm 110, and they could not answer him who the Messiah was son “saying, what think ye of Christ? Who is a child? They said to him: David. He said to them: how is it then that David, in spirit, calls him Lord, saying, the Lord said to my Lord: sit up on my right, until I put your enemies a footstool for your feet? If David thus calls him Lord, how is your son? And no one could answer him a Word; not since that day dared someone else interrogate him “(Mt 22:42 -46).

Through the approach that Jesus did, it turns out that the Psalms, as part of the Scriptures, aims to give witness to Christ, and that the Psalm 110 demonstrates that the Messiah would not only the son of David, was Lord of David, indicating his divinity.

It is worth noting that, in its vast majority, the Psalms make reference to the Messiah, and however, each one sticks to a feature of the life of the Messiah, such as: United, humanity, deity, mission, death, resurrection, etc.

Some Psalms to make reference to the relations established in eternity between the people of God (Heb 1: 5; Sl 2: 7).

The writer to the Hebrews demonstrates, through the Psalms, that the agreements signed in eternity have been implemented when the Firstborn of God was inducted into the world.

Psalm 110, verse 1: “the Lord said to my Lord: sit at my right hand, you even put your enemies by footstool of thy feet” (Psalm 110: 1), we have here the ‘ Lord ‘ setting a deadline for the ‘ Lord ‘ of the psalmist remained seated at his right hand. The psalmist was prophesying about yourself, or Christ? (At 8:34). What to think about Christ in this text? (Mt 22:42).

Before continuing, carefully read the Psalms 56 and 57, because they contain essential elements to interpret Psalm 91. Note that the Psalm 56 and 57 describe prophetically a reality that was not the psalmist David or its singers, and that the events described can refer to another person.

Another point to note, is that the Psalms are prophetic compositions with various puzzles, parables, figures, adages, proverbs, etc. Before interpreting any phrase, unravel the puzzle of the parabola. For example: why Jesus calls the scribes and Pharisees brood of vipers?

First it is necessary to understand where Jesus took such a figure to make reference to the scribes and Pharisees, and that is such a figure.

It is not possible to state categorically who the author of this Psalm. Some point to the Prophet Moses as the writer of Psalm 91 because of certain internal evidence (idioms). Others point the psalmist and King David, but there is no such need.

 

He who dwells

“He who dwells in the secret place of the most high will rest in the shadow of the Almighty”

He first step to interpret Psalm 91is answer the following question (Psalm 91: 1): Who dwells in the secret place of the most high? It is possible for men reside in the recesses of the Almighty? The answer is in the course of the Psalm: “Because thou, o Lord, are my refuge. In the most high did your housing “(Psalm 91: 9).

When he wrote this prophecy, the psalmist has referred to someone who at that moment was residing in cache (hidden place) of the Almighty, and that, in the future would be to leave the dwelling of the most high. When left the hiding place of the most high, it would be necessary to take refuge in the shadow of the Almighty (Oj 16:28).

Analyzing the first question: “who is the one who dwells in the secret place of the most high?”; “Where is the hiding place of the most high?”.

The ‘ high ‘ cache is not on Earth, because such a ‘cache says ‘ place inaccessible to men That it has, it just, immortality and dwells in unapproachable light; whom no man has seen or can see, to be honor and might forever. Amen (1 Tim. 6:16); For the course, the path of life leads upward to that deviate from hell on bass (15:24 Pr); Thundered from heaven the Lord; and the Almighty made it sound your voice (22:14 2Sm); However, nobody ascended into heaven, but what came down from heaven, the son of man which is in heaven (Oj 3:13).

Whereas the hideout of the Almighty is the sky, and ascended into heaven, nobody except the one who descended from there (Oj 3:13), concludes that Jesus is the one who lived in the secret place of the most high before being introduced to the world.

Jesus lived in the sky when this Psalm was written and the psalmist predicts that one who dwells in Heaven would rest on the protection of the Almighty, that is, the Psalm says of Christ when they empty their glory and was introduced as the only begotten son of God in the world.

There is no record in the Scriptures of someone who has lived in the secret place of the most high, but one that was to come, the son of man, him Scripture testifies that in eternity inhabited the hinterland divinity (Sl 45: 6; Is 7:14; Is 8:17; Proverbs 30: 3).

Jesus himself spoke about his glory: and now glorify thou me, o father, along with yourself, with the glory which I had with thee before the world existed (Jn 17: 5).

The Holy Apostles of Christ also spoke of the glory of Christ (Jn 1: 1 and 1 John 1: 1-3; Hb 1: 5 and 8), so that Jesus is the one who lived in hiding from God, because He is the eternal Word who was with God (Jn 1: 1).

The shadow of the Almighty refers to protection which God has established on the Messiah the Lord is who guard; the Lord is thy shade upon thy right (Sl 121: 5); Guard me as the girl’s eye; hide me under the shadow of your wings (Psalm 17: 8); Because you were the poor, and the needy in his distress; refuge from the storm, and shadow against the heat; because the breath of the oppressors is like a storm against the wall (4: 25).

Analyzing the second issue of the first verse: How Jesus rested in the shade of the Omnipotent? Obeying God’s Word is rest in the shade of the omnipotent. Trust in God’s Word is rest, which shows itself in obedience. When Jesus resigned himself to do the will of God delivering his soul in death, was rested, as entrusted in the salvation of the omnipotent.

Is in function of the truth that Jesus says: my food is to do the will of him who sent me, and perform their work (Oj 4:34).

Satisfaction, the desire, the joy of Christ was to obey the word of God, so that Isaiah prophesied saying that the word of God was in the mouth of Christ. But, the mouth speaks of abundance than there is in the heart, so that the word of God is the essence of Christ Because thou hast been my help; then, in the shadow of your wings I regozijarei (Psalm 63: 7); And put my words in thy mouth, and cover with the shadow of my hand; to plant the heavens, and to found the land, and to say to Zion: thou art my people (Is 51: 16); And made my mouth like a sharp sword, with the shadow of your hand me covered; and set me like an arrow cleanly, and I hid in his quiver (2: 49).

There is a puzzle to be solved in the prophecy of Isaias when He says that the Messiah would be like an arrow clean hidden in the quiver of the Almighty. The arrow refers to the divine sonship of Messiah, as arrow in the quiver of the offspring of a man says “like arrows in the hand of a powerful man, so are the children of the youth” (Psalm 127: 4).

The Messiah, in turn, became protection for those who trust in him and will be that man as a shelter against the wind, and a refuge from the storm, as streams of water in dry places, and as the shadow of a great rock in land thirsty (2: 32)

That is, the one that lived in eternity, for being the most high (15: 57), to be introduced in world conditional servant of the Lord, lived the predicted by the psalmist: relied entirely on the Father I well know that you always hear me, but I said this because of the crowd that is around, to believe that you have sent me (Jn 11:42); Trust in the Lord, that the encyclopedia; free, because it has pleased (Sl 22: 8) compare with Trusted in God; free-now, if loves you; because said: I am the son of God (Mt 27: 43; Is 42: 1).

Psalm 91 is prophetic and messianic, the psalmist registers some promises for the word of God that would make man. The Almighty, Lord of all, leaves his glory and takes the Child condition on its own (Sl 2: 47; Hb 3: 6). This was the agreement closed in eternity, as it reads: “Because, to which of the angels said ever: you are my son, Today I have begotten thee? And again: I will be his father, and he shall be my son? (Heb 1: 5).

In eternity God people agreed among themselves and one of them took the Child condition when introduced in the world of men. That is why the Scriptures refers to Christ as being the one who created all “But Christ as a son, about his own House; which House are we, if so only keep firm confidence and the glory of hope until the end “(Hb 3: 6; Jn 1: 3; Cl 1:16).

In Psalm 110, another prophecy about Jesus the Christ is described as Lord of the psalmist and is seen seated at the right hand of the Majesty on high. In Psalm 110 have the risen Christ returning to his place by law, while in Psalm 91 we have a prediction pointing out that Christ would leave his glory.

The Pharisees were reluctant to admit that the heavenly father had a son, this why not observed the Scriptures: Who ascended to heaven and descended? Who ended the wind in his fists? Who tied the waters in a garment? Who established all the ends of the Earth? What is your name? And what is the name of your son, if you know? (Proverbs 30: 4).

Psalm 91 complements other Psalms. Psalm 15 says: “Lord, who shall dwell in thy Tabernacle? Who shall dwell in thy Holy Hill? “ (Psalm 15: 1). As already discussed in other Psalms, only Jesus walked in sincerity, practiced righteousness and spoke the truth according to your heart (Psalm 15: 3).

Only the Christ of God has eyes able to despise the reprobate. Only He can honor those who fear the Lord (Psalm 15: 4). salm 24 says: “who will rise to the Hill of the Lord? Who will be in his tabernacle? “ (Psalm 24: 3).

The answer is clear and points to someone in specific: “one who is clean hands and pure heart, which does not deliver his soul to vanity, nor swear deceitfully. This will receive the blessing of the Lord and the Justice of God of his salvation “(Psalm 24: 4 -5). Only Jesus among the children of men was clean hands and pure heart, fulfilled all the law, received the blessing and justice.

Speaking specifically of the Messiah, the psalmist does not say ‘ whatever ‘, before using the demonstrative pronoun ‘ one ‘ in the Psalms 15, 24 and 91, because only the Christ of God has never been shaken (Psalm 15: 5).

The invitation of the Gospel is universal, since ‘ everyone who believes ‘ or ‘ any ‘ will receive eternal life by believing in Jesus, however, the Psalms are prophecies that present the Christ of God to men, as part of the Scriptures, the Psalms announce the Christ (Oj 5:39), which makes it possible to men the ‘ knowledge ‘ (the intima) of God, i.e. that men might be partakers of the divine nature (2 Peter 1: 4).

Any man who wants to dwell with the Almighty need to believe in Christ as the Scriptures to receive from God the power to be the son of God (Jn 1:12).

All those are created again, in righteousness and true holiness, are still here in this world, as Christ is (1 Jn 4: 4:17; 1 Cor. 15:48). However, if the believers are such that He is in this world, will dwell where he dwells, seen that, where it is there also will be and when I go, and you prepare place, will come again, and take you to myself, that where I is be ye also (Oj 14: 3).

Through Adam’s disobedience of the wicked generation settled and, through Christ, who is the last Adam, the generation of the righteous is established (Sl 24: 6). All those who are raised again in Christ Jesus are clean hands and pure heart. Are able to reside in the holy place, since the brothers led to glory are as the Firstborn, co-heirs of God (Rm 8:29; Hb 2:10).

Psalm 91 is a prophecy that has two distinct ‘ moments ‘ relevant to the word of God. The ‘ time ‘ that the psalmist prophesied, the word of God was living in hiding of the Almighty, however, when the word became flesh took shelter under the shadow of the Almighty to be stripped of his glory.

 

My refuge, my stronghold

“I will say of the Lord: he is my God, my refuge, my stronghold, and in him will I trust.”

One who resides in the secret place of the most high would announce the name of God to men, saying: “he is my God, my refuge, my stronghold, and in him will I trust” (Psalm 91: 2).

The writer to the Hebrews quotes Psalm 18 to demonstrate that the Child itself through the psalmist said that would put his trust in God “and again: I will put my trust in him” (Heb. 2:13; Sl 18: 1 -2; Sl 56: 4).

In Psalms 103 and 104, the psalmist demonstrates your confidence in God and bless you for your greatness and for everything he has done for the sake of men, but the Psalm 91 uses the word ‘ trust ‘ in the future (it will trust), which makes us question whether the psalmist still did not trust in God when he wrote this Psalm. In the glory, the eternal Word did not trust but to be introduced in the world end of flesh and blood and subject to the same passions than men, however, without sin, would also need to fully trust in God (Hb 4:15).

The verse 2 of Psalm 91 is equivalent to the introduction of the Psalm the psalmist leaves 31, when registered the last words of the Messiah: “In thee, o Lord, I seek refuge; never I embarrassed; deliver me by thy righteousness (…) Into your hands I commend my spirit. “ (Sl 1: 31 -5).

The word of God incarnate, the son of David would say of the Lord: “he is my God, my refuge, my stronghold”. The psalmist foretold that the Messiah would fully trust in God, even in the most grisly of existence it between men would take refuge, shelter in God, ordering your spirit.

If the psalmist were blessing the Lord, there would be no need to use the verb ‘ to say ‘ in the future (say). Generally, the psalmists, when reference to events relevant to them say: “bless Yahweh, o my soul, the Lord” (Psalm 103: 1).

The Canticle of the psalmist David is: in the Lord I trust; as you say to my soul: Flee for your mountain as bird? (Sl 11: 1).

Jesus Christ man to hear from boy to reading the Scriptures in the synagogues and within his family, allied to the testimony of signs and wonders that surrounded the event of his birth, understood by the Scriptures that he was the Messiah, the son of God incarnate. He needed to believe.

In the face of the promises that the father left recorded in the Scriptures, he believed, to become the Author and finisher of faith looking for Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, which, by the joy that it was proposed, endured the cross, despising the affront, and settled at the right hand of the throne of God (Heb 12: 2); Although he was a son, he learned obedience through what he suffered (Heb 5: 8).

 

The pestilence that walketh in darkness

“Because He will deliver you from the snare of the Fowler, and pernicious fever. He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings you will trust; his truth shall be thy shield and Buckler. You will not fear the terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by day, nor the pestilence that walketh in darkness, nor of the destruction that devastates noon. Thousand fall to thy side, and ten thousand at your right, but it will not come near you. Only with thine eyes, and see the showing reward of the wicked”

These verses are listed some events that do not reach the Firstborn of God when it was introduced in the world. The promises of God listed in these verses are specific to your child.

“Because He will deliver you from the snare of the Fowler …”-the son of man ‘ certainly ‘ wouldn’t be caught in traps (words), by more ingenious. When asked the Messiah if it was lawful to pay tribute to Cesar (Mt 22:17), or when presented the woman caught in the Act of adultery (Jn 8: 5), such traps not the crossing “Armed a network to my steps; my soul is felled. They dug a pit in front of me, however they fell in the middle of it “(Psalm 57: 6; Sl 56: 5).

“… and of pernicious fever”-the son of David was free from sin (pernicious fever), since he was raised of God (Psalm 2: 7; 2 Sam. 7:14). All descendants of Adam, i.e. who entered through the door wide, were contaminated by sin (or sold to sin as slaves), but Jesus, the last Adam, is the narrow gate through which all men who want to be free of sin must enter. “He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will trust” – the Messiah would be protected, housed safely in God’s Word. “Have mercy on me, o God, have mercy on me, because my soul trusts in thee; and the shadow of your wings I shelter, until passing the calamities “(Psalm 57: 1).

“his truth shall be thy shield and Buckler” – in all the attacks of opponents, the word of God (the truth) would be the defence of Christ. Given of the scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees Jesus quoted Scripture.

When the temptation by the devil in the desert, Christ used the truth of Scripture as a shield and Buckler (Defense).”You will Not fear the terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by day, nor the pestilence that walketh in darkness, nor of the destruction that devastates at noon” – the ‘ night terror ‘, the ‘ arrow thrown during the day ‘, the ‘ plague that moves in the dark ‘ and ‘ death that affects around noon ‘ does not bring down the Messiah.

These verses have some puzzles like: night, darkness and death.

When the man walks according to the word of God, walk in the light, because God’s Word is a lamp to my feet and a light to the path. The darkness refers to the absence of the word of truth (Is 9: 2). Says the word deception which causes the man to remain in the death on understanding, separated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, for the hardness of your heart (Ef 4:18).

Jesus is stripped of his glory and Majesty and everything has become similar to their siblings (2:17 Hb), however, fear that the men held of death and Sin not involved, since he was never subjected to the bondage of sin, and not left to lead by the doctrine of mistake (Hb 2:15).

The words of the scribes and Pharisees are a tie, traps (Psalm 119: 110), because it had the goal of diverting the Christ to do the father’s will. The loop of Fowler are words full of deceit and malice also seeking my life me arm ties and those who seek my hurt speak things that damage, and imagine gimmicks all day (Sl 38: 12); Steady in bad intent; talk about arming secretly ties, and say: who will see it? (Sl 64: 5; Pv 13:14).

From Eden to ‘ pernicious fever ‘ plagues humanity, as a sin and all have sinned. One died and all died (1 Cor. 15:21 -22), and began to speak according to their hearts liars (PS. 58: 3). The pernicious fever does not resemble the black death that decimated Europe. Neither says of chemical agents or biological weapons.

The children of the people of Messiah armed several traps in order to ‘catch ‘ the Christ in some contradiction, however, only they remained snared “Armed a network to my steps; my soul is felled. They dug a pit in front of me, however they fell in the middle of it “(Psalm 57: 6; Sl 56: 5; Mt 22:17; OJ 8: 5); “So also in Scripture if contains: Behold, I lay in Zion a Chief corner stone, elect and precious; And those who believe it will not be confused. And so for you who believe, is precious, but, for the rebels, the stone which the builders failed, This was the principal of the corner, and a stone of stumbling and rock of scand al, for those who stumble in Word, being disobedient; for what were also intended “(1 pet. 2: 6 -8; Rm 9:33).

The son of David from the womb of Mary was free from sin (pernicious fever), since It was released in the mother of God (Sl 22:10) and generated by the eternal spirit (Sl 2: 7; 2 Sam. 7:14). All descendants of Adam, wide door for whom all men come to come to the world, were contaminated by sin (the same as being sold to sin as slaves), but Jesus, the last Adam, is the narrow gate through which all men who believe becomes free of sin.

The protection of God given to the Messiah was specific: “He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings you will trust” (v. 4). In the same way that the chicken protects its chicks under her wings, the Christ was safe under the wings of the Omnipotent “have mercy on me, o God, have mercy on me, because my soul trusts in thee; and the shadow of your wings I shelter, until passing the calamities Sl “(Psalm 57: 1; and Sl 61 63: 7: 4).

The truth or the faithfulness of God was constituted as a shield and Buckler of the Messiah. All opponents came against It using words of deception, but in the word of God (the truth and fidelity) was the defence of Christ. In the face of religious Jews, Jesus presented the Scriptures in his defense. When tempted by the devil in the desert, Christ made use of Scripture.

There are people who are so creepy when they read the next verse by lack of understanding: “thou shalt have no fear the terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by day, nor the plague who walks in the darkness, nor of the destruction that devastates at noon “(v. 5). This verse is summary of the above prophetically by Psalm 64:

“hear, o God, my voice in my prayer; Guard my life from the fear of the enemy. Hide me from the Council of evil, secret and the turmoil of lawlessnessThat sharpened their tongues like swords; and armed by their bitter words arrows in order to throw in hidden place to what is healthy; trigger on him suddenly, and not fear. Steady in bad intent; talk about arming secretly ties, and say: who will see it? Go inquiring wickedness, ask everything what can be surveyed; and both, the intimate thought of each one, and the heart, are deep “(Psalm 64: 1 -6).

The soldiers are usually plagued by fear of the enemy when in battle. During the night the possibility of sneaky attack of the enemy is a torment, and during the day the hazards of enemy arrows represent terrorize also. The enemy strikes in darkness, i.e., when you lack the light of understanding of God’s Word. The arrows are deferred attacks against the Messiah while he was present among men (Oj 12:35 -36).

But, for trusting in the father is that the confidence of the Messiah is expressed in Psalm 64:-“Guard my soul of AWE the enemy!” (v. 1) what would be the arms of the enemies of the Messiah? The answer is: the language! My soul is between the Lions, and I am among those who are following, children of men, whose teeth are Spears and arrows, and your tongue sharp sword (PS 57: 4); Have sharpened the languages as the snake; the poison of ASPs is under their lips (Psalm 140: 3).

The enemies of David had sharp swords, but the son of David, the Messiah, would face men that had the sharp languages as if they were swords. The arrows of them were in bitter words! Engendravam secretly plans to give the Messiah (Oj 11:53), but the word of God shield and Buckler, the Messiah would not be reached.

For deviate from the word of the Lord, the children of Israel became a vineyard that produced poisonous wine your wine is fiery venom of snakes, and cruel venom of vipers (Dt 32: 33).

This poison was in the language of the sons of Jacob’s people have sharpened the languages as the snake; the poison of ASPs is under their lips. (Seal.) (Psalm 140: 3). But Jesus knew this peculiarity: brood of vipers, how can ye say good things, being evil? Because of that there is in abundance in the heart, the mouth speaks (Mt 12:34).

 

A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at your right

“A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at your right, but it will not come near you. Only with thine eyes, and see the contemplarás reward of the wicked “

To prevent the fall of many, the forerunner of the Messiah was sent to be yanked the stumbling of the way of the people not to turn to Christ and dir: Aplanai, aplanai road, prepare the way; put away the stumbling of the way of my people (Is 14: 57).

There is much the Prophet Isaiah foretold that the residents of the two houses of Israel would stumble because they offend Christ then it shall be a sanctuary; but will serve as a stone of stumbling and rock of scandal, the two houses of Israel; by trap and snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem (8:14).

The fall of thousands was laid down as tropeçariam on the corner stone and a stone of stumbling and rock of scandal, for those who stumble in Word, being disobedient; for what were also intended for (1Pe 2: 8).

The Christ would not need to do anything in relation to the wicked, before just look to reward them (Sl 56: 7). Why? Because Christ chose the Lord as refuge, the God that everything runs to the Messiah (PS 57: 2-3); And if anyone hears my words, and believe not, I judge not; because I came, not to judge the world, but to save the world (Oj 12:47).

Jesus did not come to condemn, before to save, so it does not emitted judgment about people (Oj 8:15; OJ 12:47).

“Because thou, o Lord, are my refuge. In the most high did your housing “

All the promises would be carried out because the Messiah has made the most high your place of refuge. This verse refers to thinking of the verse 1: the Verb inhabited the place hidden from the Almighty, however, after being introduced to the world as the first-born of God, the Incarnate Word came to rest in the shadow of the Almighty (Sl 1: 57).

The one who made your housing (refuge) in the highest (v. 9) is the one who resides in the secret place of the most high (v. 1). Who made his abode in the Almighty? The only man who made his abode in the Almighty was the descendant promised to David, the Lord that the psalmist saw at the right hand of God.

 

Stepping on the lion and the cobra

“No evil befall Thee, neither any plague come near your tent. Because he shall give his angels charge order, to keep You in all your ways. They will sustain You in your hands, so that lest you with your foot against a stone. Stepping on the lion and the cobra; crash to toe the young lion and the Dragon”

When Jesus was born, many children have been killed, however, hardly any hit. His family moved to Egypt, and none involved their earthly family Prague (Mt 2:16). To the angels was given the order about the Messiah to save it in all his ways. They would bolster the Christ to rid it of all evil (Psalm 57: 3; Sl 13: 56).

The devil is aware that the promises of the prophecy of this Psalm made reference to Christ, launched hand of Psalm 91 to tempt you. And the devil said: “If thou art the son of God, throw yourself here below. For it is written: he shall give his angels, and they will take in your hands, so that lest you dash your foot against a stone “(Mt 4: 6).

Note that:

  • The devil knows the Scriptures;
  • Launched doubts about membership of the Messiah;
  • Established a test to prove the divine sonship of Christ;
  • Gave an order with rogue basement in the Scriptures;
  • He knew the care of God stipulated in Psalm 91 for the Messiah was to protect it from direct attacks of fallen angels and evil men (Sl 5: 56; Mt 2:12 and Mt 2:13);
  • The devil knew that God does not interfere in the decisions of men, and that, if Christ decided to jump, would not be bailed out, before you would suffer the consequences of your decision as well as the first Adam.

Through the truth (v. 4) which is the shield and Buckler, Jesus replied, “also is written: you shall not tempt the Lord thy God” (Mt 4: 7).

The confidence stems from the love and faithfulness of God (Psalm 57: 3 b), immutable attributes, since the promise, he brought with oath, according to his advice. Two immutable things (Hb 6:18).

The Messiah was rested in the shadow of the Almighty, that is, aware of divine protection in all his ways and that there would be no ‘ stumble ‘. However, such protection does not cover force God to act.

Was given power to the son of man to walk between the lion and the cobra.

About serpent have a prophecy in the book of Genesis: “and I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her descendant; This will hurt the head, and thou shalt bruise his heel “(Gen. 3:15).

In addition to having wounded the head of the serpent, the Psalm 57 demonstrates that the children of the people of the Messiah are comparable to the hungry beasts, i.e. to the Lions “my soul is among Lions; I’m lying between hungry beasts, men whose teeth are throws and arrows, and whose language is sharp sword “(Psalm 57: 4).

The actions of these men can be summed up in attacking the Christ with words, forged their malignant advice lies with the intent of killing the God sent (Sl 1: 1). However, even among lions and áspides, the Messiah remained rested (lying) because he trusted in God.

 

I’ll be with him in anguish

“For so earnestly loved Me, I will deliver him; put him on a retreat, because she met My name. He shall call upon Me, and I will answer him; I’ll be with him in anguish; It’ll take, and honour him. Satisfy it with length of days, and show him my salvation “

Until the verse 13 of Psalm 91 the psalmist prophesies, verse 14 to 16, he transcribes what the Lord says, that is, changed the person’s speech.

As the Messiah rested (trust), the eternal father the freed “for you have rescued my soul from death, as well as to stumble my feet so that I walk before God in the light of life” (Psalm 56: 13). While in Psalm 91 have a prophecy that the Lord makes a promise of deliverance that would be granted to the Messiah, the Messiah in Psalm 56 we have stating that had been rescued from death.

By ‘ know ‘ (intima) the father, Christ was put on a high retreat, i.e. at the right hand of God in the highest (Sl 110: 1; OJ 10:30). The word ‘ know ‘ has two meanings in the Bible. One of the meanings is ‘ be aware of something ‘, ‘ about ‘, however, the meaning as the term ‘ know ‘ has in this Psalm is the intimate communion.

In the same way that the father and the son are separate persons, and, however, are one (Oj 10:30), all those who believe in the son are one with the father and the son (Oj 17:21 -23).

Christ would invoke the Lord (Psalm 56: 1; Sl 57: 1), and God would answer it. And as God would answer it? Not letting the Christ at the mercy of anguish? No! God has not promised to free it from anguish, before promised to be with him during the period of distress. That God was present in anguish, not necessarily the Christ should be and was distressed and took with him Peter and James and John, and began to have dread, and anguish (Mc 14:33).

Christ was not abandoned on the cross, before the father heard and answered (Sl 22:24). By the fact of having quoted Scripture when he was on the cross, many regard them that Christ was abandoned, but this bad read occurs when people fail to see that the Psalms are prophecies (Sl 1: 22; Mt 27: 46).

As we read in the Gospels, Jesus cried out to the father in Gethsemane, however, he was distressed to death, and death of the cross then came Jesus with them to a place called Gethsemane, and said to his disciples: take seat you here, while I go and pray (Mt. 26: 36). The Messiah was glorified when he delivered his spirit to the father, at which point the father withdrew from the anguish “In thee, o Lord, I seek refuge; never I embarrassed; deliver me by thy righteousness (…) Into your hands I commend my spirit. “ (Sl 1: 31 -5).

The Christ of God was glorified with the glory that he had before being introduced in the world, and joined the rest of the Father until his enemies are made his footstool by feet and now glorify thou me, o father, along with yourself, with the glory which I had with thee before the world existed (Jn 17: 5).

The promise of the father to the son is plenty of days, length, i.e. eternal life you Life asked, and lha, even length of days forever and eternally (Sl 21: 4).

The son of man saw the salvation of God “you are the most beautiful of the sons of men and the lips were anointed with grace, so God has blessed you forever. Gird your sword to thigh, o brave; pity you glory and Majesty “(Psalm 45: 2 -3).

The fence of the eternal Word who assumed the Child condition, Psalm 45 declares: “your throne, o God, is eternal and perpetual; the Scepter of Thy Kingdom is a scepter of equity. You love righteousness and hate wickedness; Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of joy, more than your fellow “(Psalm 45: 6 -7; Heb. 1: 8).

Now that you know that these promises were made for the son of man, and they say the Christ, believe in God sent, Jesus Christ man, who was killed and glorified (1 Tim. 3:16; Rm 1: 2 -4), so that you can receive from God the power to be made one of his sons (Oj 1:12). Through faith in Christ you will be co-heir of God and end of promises Because all how many promises there is of God, are Yes, and for him the Amen, to the glory of God by us (2Co 2Pe 1: 1:20; 4).

You who believed in Christ as the Scriptures (Oj 7:38), and which is, therefore, a new creature (2Co 5:17), cannot be swayed by various superstitions, such as prayers and prayers with excerpts from Psalms, or any other part of Scripture.

Do not get carried away by alleged ‘ challenges of faith ‘, where certain people incite his listeners to donate their goods or bid on certain promises, that often are empty. Words like: “If you’re not blessed tear my Bible!”; “If you have faith donate the better, or donate everything”.

The Bible assures that all believers have received from God every spiritual blessing (Ephesians 1: 3; 2 Peter 1: 3). If someone promises blessings that are not listed in Chapter 1 of the letter of Paul to the Ephesians, or those which are listed in Psalm 103, be wary.

In the same way that the father promised to be with him in anguish, Jesus also promised to believers to be with them every day (Mt 28: 20). For they had peace, warned that the world’s Christians will have tribulations (Oj 16:33). Any that promises to rid you of the daily afflictions, do not speak as the truth of the Gospel, since Christ himself has not promised to rid the Christians of afflictions, before warned that would be susceptible the afflictions.

Christians must be certain that all things work for good to them that love God and that in all things are more than winners and we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose (Rm 8:28); But in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us (Rm 8:37).




Parents, children and the church

As members of society, Christian parents need to educate their children, and they must not leave such a charge to the church, or any other institution.


Parents, children and the church

Introduction

What can I do to keep my child in the church? This is a question asked by many Christian parents.

Those with small children want formulas to prevent their children from straying from the church, and those with large children, who have distanced themselves from the church, want God to perform a miracle.

What to do?

 

Son of a believer needs to be born again

First, every Christian must be aware that ‘the children of the flesh are not children of God’. Like? Is my child, born in an evangelical and / or Protestant birthplace, not a child of God?

Now, if ‘son of a believer were a son of God’, we would have to agree that all of Abraham’s descendants are also children of God, however, this is not what the Bible teaches.

The apostle Paul, writing to Christians in Rome, made it clear that being a descendant of the flesh of Abraham is not what grants divine filiation “Not that the word of God was lacking, because not all who are from Israel are Israelites; Not because they are descendants of Abraham, are they all children” (Rom. 9: 6 -7). “… it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as descendants” (Rom. 9: 8). Now, if the children of Abraham are not children of God, it also follows that the son of a believer is not a child of God.

Therefore, anyone who wants to achieve divine sonship must have the same faith that the believer Abraham had, that is, for a Christian’s son to be a child of God, he must necessarily believe in the same way that the father believed the gospel message “Know, then, that those who are of faith are the children of Abraham” (Gal. 3: 7).

Only those who are generated through the incorruptible seed, which is the word of God, are children of God, that is, children of Christians are not necessarily children of God.

The Church is the body of Christ

Second, not all Christians must be aware that the body of Christ, which is also called a church, can be confused with human institutions, such as the family and the church. Being part of a human institution does not make man belong to the body of Christ that is, saved.

 

The responsibility to educate

As a member of society, Christian parents need to educate their children, and you should not leave such a charge to the church, or any other institution. Such task is solely and exclusively of the parents. If the parents are absent, this task should be transferred to another person who plays this role: grandparents, uncles, or, as a last resort, an institution established by society (orphanage).

Why can’t the mission of raising children be delegated? Because within normality, parents are the people who have the best and greatest trust in the first years of an individual’s life. Based on this relationship of trust, the family institution becomes a laboratory where all tests to produce a responsible citizen are carried out.

It is within the family that one learns what is authority and responsibility. Human relationships has learned and developed within the family, such as fraternity, friendship, trust, respect, affection, etc.

As parents have the best and most trusting relationship, they are also the best ones to present the gospel of Christ to children during the educational process. Therefore, it is salutary that parents do not present their children with a vindictive and spiteful God. Phrases like “- Don’t do this because daddy doesn’t like it! Or, – if you do this, God punishes! ”, Does not reflect the truth of the gospel and causes enormous damage to the child’s understanding.

The relationship that the gospel establishes between God and men is guide by trust and faithfulness. Is it possible to trust someone who is spiteful and vindictive? Not! Now, how is it possible for a young man to trust God, if what has been presented to him does not match the truth of the gospel?

Parents need to demonstrate to their children that some behaviors has not tolerated because the father and mother effectively disapprove. The father and mother effectively prohibit those such attitudes. That such behavior is harmful and the whole society disapproves.

Do not present your child with a resentful, nervous God who is ready to punish you for any misconduct. Such behavior on the part of parents clearly demonstrates that they are evading their responsibility as an educator.

Educating children by establishing a relationship of fear, having God, the church, the pastor, the priest, the devil, hell, the police, black-faced ox, etc., as executioners or punishment, ends up producing men who they do not respect institutions and despise those who exercise authority. This type of education establishes fear instead of respect, as the relationship of trust is not established. When the fear passes, there is no longer any reason to obey.

Parents who act in this way when educating their children do have their share of guilt in misleading their children. The church also has its share, because it failed to appoint parents as the only and legitimate responsible for the education of their children. The state is also guilty, as it assumes the role of educator, when in reality; it is only a vehicle for the transmission of knowledge.

If the foundations of education are not delineate within the family, and such concepts applied and experienced in family relationships, any other human institution, such as the church and the state, will be doomed to failure.

Many parents apply themselves to work, study and the church; however, they do not invest time in their children’s education. The education of children takes place full time and it is not healthy to neglect this time.

 

When to start educating?

Concern for children usually arises only when Christian parents feel that their children are distancing themselves from the church institution. Fearful appeals to imposition and coercion, forcing children to go to church. Such an attitude is even more mistaken than not having instructed the child at the right time.

These questions startle some Christian parents because they do not know what their role as a member of society is, and what their mission as an ambassador of the gospel. Christian parents cannot mix these two functions.

Christian parents have two very different missions:

a) to educate their children to be members of society, and;

b) announce the wonderful promises of the gospel to the children so that they never stray from the faith.

These missions must be carried out from an early age, taking care to deal simultaneously with the education and training of a citizen, without neglecting the teaching of the word of truth, emphasizing the love and faithfulness of God.

From a young age, the child must has be taught to respect the authorities, and it is through the parents that the child will has be exercised regarding submission to authority. Through siblings, grandparents and uncles the child will learn respect and conviviality. Like friends, teachers, neighbors and strangers, the child will learn relationships with the world.

What about the gospel? What does the Bible recommend? In Deuteronomy, we read the following: “And you will teach them to your children and speak of them while seated in your house, and walking along the path, and lying down and getting up” (Deut 6: 7). About the way of life the child must be instructed at all times, that is, at home, on the way, at bedtime and when getting up.

The instruction of the sacred ‘letters’ is the responsibility of the parents! The scriptures do not recommend delegating such a function to the Sunday school teacher; moreover, it restricts teaching time about Christ to once a week, for a period of just one hour. Very different from what the scripture recommends daily teaching.

 

Children and society

Parents need to help children understand that everyone owes obedience to parents and society. Submission to parents today is an essay and an apprenticeship to submission that will be require by society, both at school and at work.

After has being instruct even if the young person did not want to follow the gospel of Christ, we will have a citizen committed to certain social values?

One of the pertinent problems in the education of children of Christians today is in mixing family education with church. Delegating to the church the responsibility of transmitting sociocultural values ​​is a big mistake. When the young person grows up and is disappointed with certain people within the institution, he ends up moving away from the membership of the community he attended, and at the same time, he rebels against all types of social values.

When parents are aware that they do not generate children for God, they apply more to the education and evangelization of children. Nor do they despair when they see that their shoots are not in the mood to go to church. They will not feel guilty or responsible for their children when they do not address some institutional issues.

It is necessary to educate children through teaching the word of God, however, without forgetting to transmit and inculcate social values. Education includes conversation, play, scolding, warning, etc. Allow children to experience all stages of life, from childhood, adolescence and youth.

However, what to do when children stray from the church? First, it is necessary to distinguish whether children have strayed from the gospel or have distanced themselves from a particular institution.

Ignoring elementary gospel principles leads parents to confuse what it means to be a child of God with belonging to a particular church. If a child is no longer a regular at church, he should not be label a stray, or that he is striding to hell, etc.

If a person professes the truth of the gospel as the scriptures say, it means that he is not a stray, but should be alert only to the need to congregate. It may be necessary for parents to investigate why their children are leaving the habit of meeting with other Christians.

Now, if the son does not profess the truth of the gospel and continues to congregate out of habit, his condition before God is troubling. What does he know about the gospel? Does he profess the faith of the gospel? If the answer is negative, it is necessary to announce the truth of the gospel, so that he can believe and be saveding, and not just a churchgoer.




The parable of the locust of the prophet Joel

The damage described by the action of locusts, refers to the great evils resulting from the war with foreign nations and not to legions of demons. It is an unprecedented lie to say that each type of grasshopper represents legions of demons, who act on the lives of men.


The parable of the locust of the prophet Joel

Introduction

It is absurd the number of sermons, articles, books and exhibitions that describe the vision of the locusts, announced by the prophet Joel, as legions of demons that attack against the patrimony of non-tithe believers.

A simple search on the Internet returns countless articles and books [1] stating categorically that locusts are legions of demons that act directly on people’s assets, destroying houses, cars, clothes, groceries, salaries, etc. That these demons cause disasters in cars, airplanes, sink ships, tear down buildings, kill people, destroy nations, families, churches, weddings and homes.

That is right, what does the parable of the locusts announced by Joel, represent? Are locusts’ demons?

 

The parable

“What remained of the caterpillar, the locust ate it, what remained of the locust, the locust ate it and what remained of the locust, the aphid ate it.” (Joel 1: 4)

Before analyzing the text, I want to reassure the reader that the figures of the caterpillar, the grasshopper, the locust and the aphid, which make up the parable of the prophet Joel, are not demons. Any approach, in this sense, aims to deceive the unwary by making the layman and neophyte an easy prey for unscrupulous men or, at the very least, ignorant of biblical truth.

The parable that the prophet Joel announced had a specific audience: the Jews, before the dispersion. When Joel announces the message of God to the elders and inhabitants of the land, he did not aim at humanity, as if he were talking about the planet earth, before, the message was aimed at the Jewish leaders and the inhabitants of the land of Canaan, that is, the Jews. (Joel 1: 2)

To broaden the scope of prophecy, to speak to the Gentiles or even to speak to the members of the Church of Christ, is to twist the message of the prophet Joel, because the target audience of the message are the Israelites, as can be seen from the last sentence from the verse: ‘… or, in your fathers‘ days’, a way of referring to the previous generations of the children of Israel.

“Hear this, you elders and listen, all the inhabitants of the earth: Did this happen in your days or, in your parents’ days?” (Joel 1: 2)

The Israelites should relay the message of the prophet Joel, about the locusts, to their children and the children to their children, so that the message would reach future generations. (Joel 1: 3)

Moreover, what are the locusts in the parable? The answer is found in verse 6: a powerful and numerous foreign nation!

“For a powerful nation without number has risen against my land; their teeth are dandelions and they have the jaws of an old lion.” (Joel 1: 6)

The prophet Jeremiah, too, alluded to the foreign invasion, using other figures:

“Because I will visit you with four kinds of evils, says the Lord: with a sword to kill and with dogs, to drag them, with birds of the sky and with animals of the earth, to devour and destroy them.” (Jer 15: 3)

The prophet Moses already predicted the invasion of foreign nations:

“The LORD will raise up against you a nation from afar, from the end of the earth, which flies like an eagle, a nation whose language you will not understand; Fierce-faced nation, which will not respect the old man’s face, nor pity the young man; And he will eat the fruit of your animals and the fruit of your land, until you are destroyed; and he will not leave you grain, must, nor oil, nor the calves of your cows, nor of your sheep, until he has consumed you. ” (Deut 28: 49-51)

The prophet Joel makes the same prediction, however, composes a parable to facilitate the announcement of future events, from parents to children. How could anyone forget a parable that features locusts, which devour everything in front of him or her?

The Chaldean invasion is compared to the destruction caused by locusts, as they would invade the cities of Israel, which resembled Eden, of which, after the Babylonian invasion, only desolation would remain.

“Day of darkness and darkness; day of clouds and dense darkness, like the morning spread over the mountains; great and powerful people, which there never was, since ancient times, nor after them for years to come, from generation to generation. Before him, a fire consumes and behind him a blazing flame; the land before him is like the Garden of Eden, but behind him a desolate desert; yes, nothing will escape you. ” (Joel 2: 2-3)

The parable of the locusts served the purpose of illustrating the predicted by Moses, because the nation that would invade Israel would devour everything that the animals and the field produced. There would be no grain, must, oil or animal offspring, due to foreign invasion.

The vine and the fig tree are figures that refer to the two houses of the sons of Jacob: Judah and Israel, so that the prophecy and parable represent, only and exclusively, the children of Israel. To put men, or Gentiles, or the church, as objects of the locusts’ action, is a fantasy of the head of an ill-informed person.

The prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah compared the stranger nations to wild beasts of the field, instead of using the figure of the locusts:

“You, all the animals of the field, all the animals of the woods, come and eat” (Is 56: 9);

“Therefore, a lion from the forest struck them, a wolf from the deserts will plague them; a leopard watches over its cities; whoever comes out of them will be shattered; because their transgressions increase, their apostasies multiplied.” (Jer 5: 6)

The damage described by the action of locusts, refers to the great evils resulting from the war with foreign nations and not to legions of demons. It is an unprecedented lie to say that each type of grasshopper represents legions of demons, who act on the lives of men.

Anyone who says that the grasshopper is a kind of legion of demons, who acts in the life of those who do not obey God, is a liar.

God cursed the earth because of Adam’s disobedience and, finally, determined that man would eat the sweat on his face (Gen. 3: 17-19). That divine determination falls on the just and the unjust! Another curse that fell on humanity, Jews and Gentiles, was death, by which all men are alienated from the glory of God.

Nevertheless, despite the curse resulting from Adam’s offense, luck is cast on the lap of all his descendants, without distinction of righteous and unjust “because time and chance affect everyone, indistinctly” (Prov 9:11). Everyone who works in this life has the right to eat, because the law of sowing is the same for everyone: just and unjust.

To say that the cutter locust acts on the life of infidels is a fallacy. To say that part of what an infidel gains from his work, belongs to demons is scabrous, because the land and its fullness belong to the Lord.

Using Isaiah 55, verse 2, to talk about finances, testifies against the truth of Scripture. When Isaiah asks the people, about spending what they earned with work on what is not bread, he was not talking about cigarettes, drinks, entertainment, medicine, etc. God was rebuking the people for spending what he acquired on sacrifices, offerings that did not please God (Isa 1: 11-12; Isa 66: 3).

What God is pleased with, and which truly satisfies man, is that he will listen to the word of God, because, ‘to answer is better than to sacrifice’. (1 Sam 15:22) However, the children of Israel were given to sacrifices, that is, they spent the fruit of labor on what they could not satisfy!

“But Samuel said, ‘Does the LORD have so much pleasure in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the word of the LORD? Behold, obeying is better than sacrificing, and serving it better than sheep fat. ” (1 Sam 15:22)

It is absurd to say that the destructive locust refers to natural calamities, disasters, bad weather, etc., but to apply John 10, verse 10, in which the thief came, if not to kill, steal and destroy, as being the action of the devil , it is bad reading with ulterior motives. To say that the legion of demons, which the destructive locust represents, are murderers who do what John 10 says, verse 10; it’s nefarious.

The thief Jesus said came to kill, steal and destroy does not refer to the devil, but to the leaders of Israel, who came before Him. Israel’s leaders were thieves and robbers, for they acted before Jesus came, because of what the prophets foretold:

“Is this house, which is called by my name, a cave of robbers in your eyes? Behold, I, myself, have seen this, saith the LORD. ” (Jer 7:11);

“All who came before me are thieves and robbers; but the sheep did not hear them.” (John 10: 8);

“The thief comes only to steal, to kill and to destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it abundantly.” (John 10:10);

“And he said to them, it is written, my house will be called a house of prayer; but you have made it a den of thieves”. (Mt 21:13)

The conclusion of the speakers who use the parable of the locusts is even stranger when it proposes a way to overcome the locusts: to be a tither!

Whereas the locusts represented the Chaldean nation, which invaded Jerusalem in 586 BC, when Nebuchadnezzar II – Babylonian emperor – invaded the Kingdom of Judah, destroying both the city of Jerusalem and the Temple, and deporting Jews to Mesopotamia , how to overcome these ‘locusts’, if the Chaldeans are extinct?

In addition to saying that the locusts in Joel’s parable are various kinds of demons, many speakers say that the only way to beat them is through faithfulness in tithes and offerings! Untruth!

The children of Israel suffered the invasion of foreign nations, because they did not rest the land, according to the word of the Lord, and not because they were not tithers, as we read:

“And I will scatter you among the nations, and draw the sword behind you; your land will be desolate and your cities will be deserted. Then the land will enjoy its Sabbaths, all the days of its desolation and you will be in the land of your enemies; then the land will rest and play on its Saturdays. He will rest every day of desolation, because he did not rest on your Sabbaths, when habitable in it” (Lev 26:33 -35).

It is because of not having rested the earth that God established Daniel’s 70 weeks, as recorded in the Book of Chronicles:

“That the word of the LORD might be fulfilled by the mouth of Jeremiah, until the land is pleased with its Sabbaths; all the days of desolation rested, until the seventy years were fulfilled.” (2 Chr 36:21).

Malachi’s complaint about bringing all tithes to the treasury is long after the Babylonian deportation (Mal 3:10). The prophet Malachi was a contemporary of Ezra and Nehemiah, in the period after exile, when the walls of Jerusalem were already rebuilt, around 445 BC.

The Bible is clear:

“As a bird wanders, as a swallow does flying, so the curse without a cause will not come”. (Pr 26: 2)

Was the curse befallen the children of Israel by the action of demons? Not! Demons are cursed by nature, but they are not the cause of curses on humanity. The cause of the curse that befell the children of Israel was disobedience to the precepts of God, delivered by Moses. The Babylonian invasion only occurred because of Israel’s disobedience and not by the action of demons!

To the children of Israel, God proposed blessings and curses and the motto for receiving them was, respectively, obedience and disobedience. The cause of the curse was disobedience, because without a curse there will be no curse.

In addition, who instituted the curse? God Himself!

“It will be, however, that if you do not listen to the voice of the Lord your God. so as not to be careful to keep all his commandments and his statutes, which I command you today, then all these curses will come upon you and will overtake you: Damn you in the city and damn you in the country. Damn your basket and your kneader. Cursed is the fruit of your womb and the fruit of your land and the offspring of your cows and your sheep. Cursed you will be when you enter and cursed you will be when you leave. The LORD will send a curse on you; confusion and defeat in everything you put your hand to do; until you are destroyed and until you suddenly perish, because of the wickedness of your works, for which you left me. ” (Deut 28: 15-20)

It is certain that, without cause, there is no curse!

Financial contribution to a given institution does not free anyone from demons, curses, evil eye, etc. Such messages are deceitful to link the simple ones. It is not because you do not have knowledge that you has not be penalized:

“The warned see evil and hide; but the simple ones pass and suffer the penalty.” (Pr 27:12)

Claiming ignorance before God does not free anyone from the consequences. Hence the need for man to be attentive to the voice of God.

However, there are those who hear the word of God, however, decide to walk according to what their deceitful heart proposes, thinking that they will have peace. Great mistake, because the Lord’s blessing is for those who listen to his word.

“And it may happen that, when someone hears the words of this curse, he will bless himself in his heart, saying: I will have peace, even if I walk according to the opinion of my heart; to add to the thirst, the drinking.” (Deut 29:19)

The apostle Paul to the Corinthians expresses the lesson that the believer in Christ Jesus draws from what was saying the parable of the locusts:

“And these things were done to us in figure, lest we covet bad things, as they did.” (1 Cor 10: 6).

For those who believe that Jesus is the Christ, there is no longer condemnation, and what we read from the children of Israel is so that we do not make the same mistakes. If there is no condemnation for someone who is a new creature, it is certain that he is hiding with Christ in God; therefore, he does not have to be afraid of demons, curses, etc.

Whoever is in Christ the evil one does not touch, for he is hiding with Christ, in God?

“We know that everyone who is born of God does not sin; but what is generated of God keeps itself, and the evil one does not touch it. ” (1 John 5:18);

“Because you are already dead and your life is hidden with Christ, in God.” (Col 3: 3)

All believers in Christ has been blesseding with all the spiritual blessings in Christ Jesus (Eph. 1: 3), so there is no need to fear the action of demons.

The only curse that can reach a believer is to let himself be deceived by men who, with cunning, deceitfully deceive themselves, moving away from the truth of the gospel (Eph 4:14; 2 Pet 2: 20-21),

Therefore, in relation to all things, he is more than a winner, and no creature can separate him from the love of God, who is in Christ.

“But in all these things, we are more than winners, by the one who loved us. Because I am sure that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor the present, nor the future, nor the height, nor the depth, nor any other creature, can separate us of the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Rom. 8: 37-39)